As for "non-radiation" of dense hydrogen, according to Mayer the binding
energy of the electron in dense hydrogen is around 3.7 keV. A single
x-ray of this energy is emitted on densification, which is contrary to
Mills view of multiple steps.
Once radiated, of course, the dense hydrogen then has lower angular
momentum and will not further radiate, in Mayer's theory, but the
initial radiation and mass deficit is due to the single step increase in
binding energy of the deflated electron. The lesson here is you must
ditch the multi-step theory of Mills in order to appreciate that this
species does radiate - once.
There is apparent evidence of Mayer's explanation coming from cosmology.
An x-ray near this value is seen in dozens of cosmological scans and has
been attributed to "dark matter". Lately it was documented in the core
of the Milky Way. The identical signal has also shown up in hundreds of
other galaxies and there is no known line to account for it. The signal
presumably comes from new hydrogen being densified, not from the already
existing dark matter. The pre-existing DM would not further radiate.
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2017/02/nasa-a-strange-mystery-signal-from-deep-inside-the-milky-way-may-reveal-the-dark-side-of-our-univers.html
There is an ongoing question about this x-ray of Mayer and its
calculated value of ~3.7 keV -- while the cosmological observation is
3.56 keV (redder). In order to reconcile the difference, the argument is
that in addition to cosmological redshift, which is already factored in,
there is additional gravitational redshift coming from dark matter in
the galaxy core which is where the emission always originates.
Everyone seems to have an opinion on this, but the Dark Matter x-ray
story has attracted a huge amount of attention from all fields of
science - and if Mayer is correct, then it means that Mills has been
locked into a incorrect understanding for several decades.