As for "non-radiation" of dense hydrogen, according to Mayer the binding energy of the electron in dense hydrogen is around 3.7 keV. A single x-ray of this energy is emitted on densification, which is contrary to Mills view of multiple steps.

Once radiated, of course, the dense hydrogen then has lower angular momentum and will not further radiate, in Mayer's theory, but the initial radiation and mass deficit is due to the single step increase in binding energy of the deflated electron. The lesson here is you must ditch the multi-step theory of Mills in order to appreciate that this species does radiate - once.

There is apparent evidence of Mayer's explanation coming from cosmology. An x-ray near this value is seen in dozens of cosmological scans and has been attributed to "dark matter". Lately it was documented in the core of the Milky Way. The identical signal has also shown up in hundreds of other galaxies and there is no known line to account for it. The signal presumably comes from new hydrogen being densified, not from the already existing dark matter. The pre-existing DM would not further radiate.

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2017/02/nasa-a-strange-mystery-signal-from-deep-inside-the-milky-way-may-reveal-the-dark-side-of-our-univers.html

There is an ongoing question about this x-ray of Mayer and its calculated value of ~3.7 keV -- while the cosmological observation is 3.56 keV (redder). In order to reconcile the difference, the argument is that in addition to cosmological redshift, which is already factored in, there is additional gravitational redshift coming from dark matter in the galaxy core which is where the emission always originates.

Everyone seems to have an opinion on this, but the Dark Matter x-ray story has attracted a huge amount of attention from all fields of science - and if Mayer is correct, then it means that Mills has been locked into a incorrect understanding for several decades.



Reply via email to