Bob,
" If Mills wants to convince his critics, he should publish credible
calorimetry of one of his devices over the course of a reasonable time
period (at least twelve hours). He should describe the experiment in
detail, and provide data and analysis."
I doubt he has any incentive to convert the skeptics. His schedule is
for a fully working SunCell this summer. From the comments here I doubt
even that will convince them
AA
On 3/27/2017 12:16 PM, Bob Higgins wrote:
I don't think anyone outside of Mills' team can say that he has made
even 1W of excess heat from any of his devices. The one quick bomb
calorimetry demo done was very crude calorimetry, was not believable,
and a paper was not published on it. If Mills wants to convince his
critics, he should publish credible calorimetry of one of his devices
over the course of a reasonable time period (at least twelve hours).
He should describe the experiment in detail, and provide data and
analysis. He wouldn't have to publish anything about what is inside
his black box. He doesn't need to wait on mythical photovoltaics to
make this measurement. He could establish credibility with one such
paper. If he published a credible paper, we would believe his result
with some measure of confidence. There must be a reason he hasn't
established his credibility this way.
Without having done this, he is relegating himself into the same class
of pseudo-science as Rossi: hyped un-demonstrated science. He shows
pretty stuff, but the data is never published, and then he moves on to
something else.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:55 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Brian,
He has demonstrated the SunCell to various audiences. Mills says
he will demonstrate the SunCell producing power soon after the
required photovoltaics are developed and in pace - later this
year. Obviously he can't do that before.
You are saying he is a fraud and will never do that, without
proof. I have trouble understanding the vocal critics here who
seem to be of a class "NO! What was the question?" Strikes me as
very unscientific.
Slightly related see.
http://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/uk-should-be-generating-research-into-world-changing-cold-fusion-system-1-4400376
<http://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/uk-should-be-generating-research-into-world-changing-cold-fusion-system-1-4400376>
AA
On 3/27/2017 5:38 AM, Brian Ahern wrote:
It has never been independently observed, but is often quoted.
If it was true, he could openly demonstrate it operating.
