Axil,
I am not able to judge the properties of many of these smaller
particles. They seem to be more a matter of the individual's belief
than pinned down by experiment. Let me know when someone /proves/ the
existence of a magnetic monopole.
AA
On 4/1/2017 3:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi et al are confusing cause and effect. The strong and the weak
force produce nuclear change and the subatomic particles are the
effects of how those forces function. The strong and the weak force
produce the pion, muons, and mesons that Rossi is now factoring into
his theory. But these particles are just the effects of what the
strong force is doing in LENR. LENR is a condition where the strong
force changes the way it behaves. The particles are the results of
this change in behavior.
Professional science states the the fundamental forces of nature
cannot change unless they are affected by the application of extremes
in energy. If enough energy is present, then the fundamental forces
will gradually become unified. This is the main tenet in supersymmetry.
But as witnessed by LENR, the fundamental forces do not behave in this
way. As Rossi states, these forces change when a special type of
magnetism is applied to the fundamental forces of nature. Rossi has
picked the quadrupole magnetic force as the factor that changes the
action of the fundamental forces. This pick is wrong. But informed by
other LENR experimentation, we know that the proper LENR active
magnetic force format is the monopole magnetic force.
But we must give him his due, Rossi is very close to having LENR
theory correct in its most basic aspects.
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com
<mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am not being snarky. I am just stating something evident. And
you seem to forget that I side with Rossi and I think all is wrong
with IH "evidences".
2017-04-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>:
Why be so snarky? You have no clue when Rossi learnt that.
Jumping to conclusions on such flimsy evidence does nothing
for your credibility.
AA
On 3/31/2017 6:10 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Not really a big deal. That's a merely cursory knowledge of
particle physics. He probably learned about this when writing
his last paper.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com <mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>
