Axil,
So you say, and I don't mean that disparagingly. I don't know and don't
have the time to investigate those esoteric theories well enough to
understand if they are right. As far as I know, no one has ever
demonstrated a magnetic monopole but some talk about them as real. The
proof is less convincing to me than that Rossi 's E-Cat works. In both
cases I'd rather wait and see.
AA
On 4/1/2017 7:30 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
There is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a
monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and a magnetic field formatted to
support monopole flux lines.
The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field
(almost a monopole formated magnetic field).
This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force.
That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction.
To refresh your memory, see
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:36 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Axil,
I am not able to judge the properties of many of these smaller
particles. They seem to be more a matter of the individual's
belief than pinned down by experiment. Let me know when someone
/proves/ the existence of a magnetic monopole.
AA
On 4/1/2017 3:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi et al are confusing cause and effect. The strong and the
weak force produce nuclear change and the subatomic particles are
the effects of how those forces function. The strong and the weak
force produce the pion, muons, and mesons that Rossi is now
factoring into his theory. But these particles are just the
effects of what the strong force is doing in LENR. LENR is a
condition where the strong force changes the way it behaves. The
particles are the results of this change in behavior.
Professional science states the the fundamental forces of nature
cannot change unless they are affected by the application of
extremes in energy. If enough energy is present, then the
fundamental forces will gradually become unified. This is the
main tenet in supersymmetry.
But as witnessed by LENR, the fundamental forces do not behave in
this way. As Rossi states, these forces change when a special
type of magnetism is applied to the fundamental forces of nature.
Rossi has picked the quadrupole magnetic force as the factor that
changes the action of the fundamental forces. This pick is wrong.
But informed by other LENR experimentation, we know that the
proper LENR active magnetic force format is the monopole magnetic
force.
But we must give him his due, Rossi is very close to having LENR
theory correct in its most basic aspects.
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rocha
<danieldi...@gmail.com <mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I am not being snarky. I am just stating something evident.
And you seem to forget that I side with Rossi and I think all
is wrong with IH "evidences".
2017-04-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>>:
Why be so snarky? You have no clue when Rossi learnt
that. Jumping to conclusions on such flimsy evidence does
nothing for your credibility.
AA
On 3/31/2017 6:10 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Not really a big deal. That's a merely cursory knowledge
of particle physics. He probably learned about this when
writing his last paper.
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com <mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>
