Axil— I agree with your notion of current science. IMHO what’s happening (slowly) to physics and chemistry and the other sciences is a gradual change in the scientific community to accepting facts instead of hiding their head in dogma and more myths because of the lack good solid facts, often hid by institutional (political) control of the scientific community. This is what has by happened starting in the 1930’s to institutions of “higher learning” under the thumb of government control via financing but seems to be back on the right track with the event of the internet and better communication among individuals.
The same thing happened to the community of “scholars” in the reformation of Christian dogma. Darwin and new geologists following various Italians like Galileo and his predecessors forced facts on the large community of “scholars”—the priests—and the lay people who tended to have a better sense of reason. The complex dogma—non-reason—lost favor by the common people because of the event of mass education in the liberal arts starting with the invention of the printing press. The internet is proving to provide a similar improvement in communication among the masses with access to unbiased ideas in many instances. Of course there is the danger of institutional control of free exchange of ideas and data—facts—in order to maintain the status quo with a financial advantage for some. An education policy of conservative arts does not foster change, which LENR will cause IMHO. Bob Cook From: Axil Axil Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 6:21 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics. LENR will redefine a goodly amount of our current science. Unfortunately because of this new paradigm in science, LENR is very esoteric. To support my assertion, this following reference shows that the Surface Plasmon Polariton (SPP) quasiparticle produces a monopole magnetic field. Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.3564.pdf On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 9:01 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: Axil, So you say, and I don't mean that disparagingly. I don't know and don't have the time to investigate those esoteric theories well enough to understand if they are right. As far as I know, no one has ever demonstrated a magnetic monopole but some talk about them as real. The proof is less convincing to me than that Rossi 's E-Cat works. In both cases I'd rather wait and see. AA On 4/1/2017 7:30 PM, Axil Axil wrote: There is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and a magnetic field formatted to support monopole flux lines. The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a monopole formated magnetic field). This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force. That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. To refresh your memory, see http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:36 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: Axil, I am not able to judge the properties of many of these smaller particles. They seem to be more a matter of the individual's belief than pinned down by experiment. Let me know when someone proves the existence of a magnetic monopole. AA On 4/1/2017 3:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote: Rossi et al are confusing cause and effect. The strong and the weak force produce nuclear change and the subatomic particles are the effects of how those forces function. The strong and the weak force produce the pion, muons, and mesons that Rossi is now factoring into his theory. But these particles are just the effects of what the strong force is doing in LENR. LENR is a condition where the strong force changes the way it behaves. The particles are the results of this change in behavior. Professional science states the the fundamental forces of nature cannot change unless they are affected by the application of extremes in energy. If enough energy is present, then the fundamental forces will gradually become unified. This is the main tenet in supersymmetry. But as witnessed by LENR, the fundamental forces do not behave in this way. As Rossi states, these forces change when a special type of magnetism is applied to the fundamental forces of nature. Rossi has picked the quadrupole magnetic force as the factor that changes the action of the fundamental forces. This pick is wrong. But informed by other LENR experimentation, we know that the proper LENR active magnetic force format is the monopole magnetic force. But we must give him his due, Rossi is very close to having LENR theory correct in its most basic aspects. On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote: I am not being snarky. I am just stating something evident. And you seem to forget that I side with Rossi and I think all is wrong with IH "evidences". 2017-04-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>: Why be so snarky? You have no clue when Rossi learnt that. Jumping to conclusions on such flimsy evidence does nothing for your credibility. AA On 3/31/2017 6:10 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: Not really a big deal. That's a merely cursory knowledge of particle physics. He probably learned about this when writing his last paper. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
