yes http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/0194.09_Exhibit_9.pdf
and some e-mails by him etc. peter On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: > > Was Penon deposed? He is the central figure in the trial. Has he answered > questions under oath? > > If not, why not? > > The ERV is moot without his sworn testimony under fear of jepoardy. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, April 3, 2017 10:15 AM > *To:* VORTEX > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics. > > Jed, > you suggest anyone reading the Penon report will have a Rothwellian > negative > revelation of nothingness. > I may ask all our colleagues from this relatively inactive forum,: do you > agree with Jed, or on the contrary they have the intuition of a successful > test? > > The data presented in the report are based on many raw measurements. > > peter > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> If LENR produces tons of energy in the aggregate, it will also produce >>>>> tons of all pervasive and highly penetrating meson based radiation >>>>> exposure. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If that were true, I would be dead. >>>> >>> >> >> >> I doubt that you have seen LENR, at least in any measurable >>> amounts...like Rossi has😉. >>> >> >> Either you missed the point or you are arguing for arguments sake. >> Suppose I have not seen LENR. Many other people have, at power levels up to >> 100 W. If you are correct, even a fraction of 1 W would generate fatal >> doses of radiation. As I am sure you know, the day after cold fusion was >> announced plasma fusion scientists pointed this out. >> >> If you believe that Rossi has seen kilowatt levels and megawatt levels of >> cold fusion, then surely you understand it cannot be producing radiation at >> the levels you describe. He would be dead. You cannot have it both ways. >> >> In fact, Rossi did not see any cold fusion effect during the one-year >> test. The test was a fraud; the data was fake, as anyone can see from the >> Penon report (Exhibit 197-03) >> >> http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ >> 0197.03_Exhibit_3.pdf >> >> It is possible he saw some effect previously, but I doubt it. >> >> - Jed >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
