I would say that plasma arcs may be detected with a good radio receiver or a fast oscilloscope with a directional EM receiver. The spectrum of the noise would be significant.
The black box may be shielded however. A check for shielding for EM frequency transmission should be accomplished using a (variable frequency) directional transmitter and receiver. White EM noise should be created by a plasma electrolysis at holes in an imperfect shield. I assume an x-ray image of the black box is off limits per testing proto-call. However, I agree with Bob that the device does not likely involve plasma-electrolysis. Bob Cook From: Bob Higgins<mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 11:38 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: [Vo]: MFMP starting to test me356 reactor today I do not believe the Aura device is a plasma electrolysis system. I believe it is a Ni-H system with a dry reactor that is electrically stimulated. The water is from cooling of the reactor. MFMP will be measuring wall plug power as the input to the Aura device with two different power analyzers. The wall plug power should not be as hard to measure as plasma electrolysis input power. I agree that there are serious issues with measuring the power of a plasma electrolysis system by measuring voltage and current. With the bubbles popping up and instantly changing the cell voltage and current, it doesn't surprise me in the least that ultrasound and low RF signals are detected. I also agree that measuring steam accurately is an issue. However, measuring steam via heat exchanger or by sparging the steam is conservative - if anything it will report less energy than actually exists in the steam (with any entrained hot water). Thus, the COP measured would be lower than the actual device is producing. On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>> wrote: May I make a prediction? When the COP is around 6-8 and the process is plasma electrolysis, the input is invariably under reported. The plasma is actually a series of sporadic arcs. Measuring the I(t) and V(t) simultaneously is impossible for all but the most sophisticated test equipment. If the plasma electrolysis is not in operation, but boiling is; then we face the issue of dry versus wet steam which causes errors consonant with a COp around 6-8. From: Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:53 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: [Vo]: MFMP starting to test me356' reactor today Four members of MFMP are in Czechoslovakia and starting to do a black box test of me356' reactor. It is supposed to be similar to his previous model that has been running several months now. It was reported to be ~10 Kw with a COP >6. See http://www.e-catworld.com/2017/05/23/mfmp-on-site-preparing-for-me356-testing/
