This Meyer conspiracy nonsense is kind of a silly waste of time IMHO - even if there were some proof ... (not that there aren't real conspiracies in the world today)
Stan Meyer was not murdered, most likely. Nor was Gene Mallove. Meyer had many risk factors for Aneurysm, which is probably what happened. A feeling of "being poisoned" is common among many sudden pathologies which are totally unrelated to food - such as a heart attack. The larger problem with all of this talk is that it probably does the whole field of alternative-energy a huge *disservice* to suggest things like this on little or no evidence. It is the underlying " flawed belief process" more so than the conclusion, which is worrisome. It reinforces the notion among the majority of open-minded readers of these posts - or of LENR-CANR and so forth - that the only people who could possibly believe that low level nut-cases like Meyer would attract the attention of the putative PetroMafia are those who will "believe in anything" especially of a "high level conspiracy" nature. Even if one accepts that there are rogue elements in government (there are), and in a handful of corporations, such as Halliburton - that is far from the pervasive kind of evil it would take to murder someone whose greatest value, under any circumstances, might be as "martyr value" or as "mobilization value". IOW Meyer was nothing more than a marginal inventor, not a scientist in any way, even if he had stumbled on something of value - he could not advance it. He probably did stumble on something, but it will take millions to figure out what. Papp was the same. Joe Newman was a prototype. There are dozens of these fringe characters, not just "cranks" but even further out there - who may deserve some kind of poetic justice for all the false-alarms and scams they have promoted, but do not even remotely concern big corporations, or Sam. IOW - let's say for the sake of argument that there is an active and well-funded PetroMafia operating in the USA, and that it does manage to pull-off a lot of underhanded things - such as to secure drilling rights, intimidate land-owners, keep out labor unions, pay-off or black-mail politicians, discredit ecologists and concerned scientists and so forth - why would they waste time on a nut like Meyer? ... who let's remind ourselves, actually accomplished ZERO of a repeatable nature, and whose death might possibly trigger 'reactionary' funding to scientists operating in that field, who could do something that the paranoid inventor himself could only stumble-on, if he even got that far. The suggestion of a conspiracy to murder Meyer is ludicrous IMHO. Now if someone took out a real genius of the level of Puthoff, R. Mills, George Miley, Bockris, Mizuno etc - then yes - that would be a huge concern. IOW these men are accomplished, influential, "in the know", and capable of sounding a preliminary threat for fossil fuel with a single experiment. Meyer may have gotten lucky, but he was no such threat. Jones
