Jed Rothwell
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:40:59 -0800
Jones Beene wrote:
...more like 70 than 7.Let's say they were electrolyzing 5 gallons "per hour," instead of "per minute" - (this info has been passed around the web enough for typos to be repeated) that is still plenty of gas to power an ICE if much of it was short lived chemical intermediaries, or even some kind of stable capacitance - instead of steam.
I suppose 5 gallons per hour would be right on the money for a race car. That would make sense. As you say, it is off by a factor of 70 -- or 60, as in 60 minutes.
I was reluctant to post this at all . . .
Heck, why? It is on topic. Thanks for sharing it. - Jed