vortex-l  

Re: [Vo]:How to confirm that a document at LENR-CANR.org is real

OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:35:50 -0800

Jed sez:

> Steven V Johnson wrote:

>>Mauro sez:
>>
>> > This is a good summary.
>> > Maybe you could publish a version of it somewhere at
>> > lenr-canr.org. It surely will not hurt, and could help
>> > first comers with doubts about the validity of the sources
>> > and the information presented.
>
>>...
>>
>>I agree!
>
>>Write it up, Jed!

> I do not think I should. I do not like to feed the perception that
> cold fusion is disreputable or that we have something to apologize
> for. If people want to believe I faked the DIA document that's their
> business. As long as I am square with the DIA, I don't care what
> anyone else thinks.

...

But IMHO, it seems to me that occasionally you DO care what others
think. We're only human. Why did you go after Scientific American so
many years ago? Why did you also post that series of email exchanges
pertaining to that interesting event? (They were enjoyable to read,
BTW.) Were you not in a sense defending the "honor" of all the papers
loaded out to lenr-canr.org?

Obviously, CF is still considered controversial, even a bogus science,
by the perceptions of many individuals. Why not point out some of the
fallacies that continue to perpetuate such misperceptions?

It's certainly not my intention or suggestion that lenr-canr.org needs
to defend itself. If anything, I would hope the suggested document
would be perceived more as an informative essay in regards to the
fallacies certain individuals hide behind when they refuse to accept
the accumulation of scientific evidence posted out at lenr-canr.org.

This is just a personal opinion. A suggestion. I'm not trying to make
more busy work for your already busy schedule. ;-)

Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks