Re: [Vo]:How to confirm that a document at LENR-CANR.org is real

[Jed Rothwell]

Steven V Johnson wrote:

Wouldn't it be nice to have something already prepared? Like 
references?  ...as well as why those who are saying I'm a crook 
should be discounted?

I guess I could throw this document at 'em, couldn't I? Minus the 
"hoosegow" part. People don't even know what that means anymore.

On rare occasions someone bring up the "pathological science" 
chestnut. I usually refer them to this document, that I wrote and 
Kowalski preserved:

http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/293wikipedia.html

I thought this was too political and incendiary for LENR-CANR.org. I 
try to steer clear of tit-for-tat arguments like this at 
LENR-CANR.org, because they give the reader a bad impression. (I 
don't mind having them elsewhere.) Also, I am trying to make nice to 
large institutions such as the DIA and various universities. For 
example, I am trying to get the University of Nagoya to give me 
permission to upload ICCF-3. They prefer a staid, sedate, academic 
web site. I leave the rabble rousing to Steve Krivit, who does a 
better job of it than I do anyway. You might call this the good cop 
bad cop routine.

- Jed