At 07:40 PM 10/27/2010, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Speaking of Q-Zeno & Q-Foam
>
>
http://www.examiner.com/technology-in-san-francisco/scientists-may-have-found-gold-water
Interesting method of bubble control.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7517430.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7297288.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6960307.pdf
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6932914.pdf
The technology of bubble control is real, I believe. If anyone could
pull off sonofusion, it would be them. But what they are claiming
goes way, way beyond that, and the best opinion I've seen on this is
that the experimental evidence does not support the theoretical
conclusions they are now promoting -- but they are, so far, only
promoting this on the CMNS list, which is downright weird.
The theoretical conclusions are so wild, that the equally wild
experience they report is called into question.
One of the fishy aspects of this is that David Nagel of the U.S.
Naval Research Laboratory is very aware of their work, and has been
for years. The reported nuclear accident, he knows about.
If he believed this was real, almost certainly the military would
have immediately clamped down on this, and the investigation would
continue under government support and control. As has been noticed
here, they have, if their reports are true, developed a nifty nuclear
device or trigger.
This isn't lightweight stuff. If this were real, we would almost
certainly not be hearing about it.
That's not "conspiracy theory," that is an understanding of what a
sensible national security agency would do.
There are many aspects of the reports that I gave here which are very
odd. I won't bother to list them, but my own conclusion was to be
wary abut accepting any of the reports as real. Maybe they are real,
I couldn't possibly advance an impossibility argument, based on what
is, bottom line, a series of observations of phenomena previously unknown.
They claim to want to get the information out. So, first place they
post about this is the private CMNS list? (That posting coincided
with the appearance of the examiner.com article.) Both of those are
not places to get mainstream attention!
