Steven V Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> For me this truly begs a nagging question. Of what importance, if any, > could actually be discussed at such a meeting conducted by Melich. > A great deal. Melich has a lot of technical info on this. He has read the papers published by Rossi and understands them better than I do. It's my understanding, according to Krivit, that Rossi has stated that > Melich is NOT speaking on his behalf. > No one speaks for Rossi. > > ON WHOSE BEHALF IS MELICH SPEAKING FOR? What's Melich's objective? > What's in it for him? > That's a really dumb comment. This is a scientific conference. He is speaking on behalf of science, reporting technical facts. That's what people do at conferences. His objective is to enlighten his colleagues. This is not a secret conspiracy or a pulp thriller. It is real life. It is a physics conference. Dull as dishwater, believe me. - Jed
