Fran,
I've been following you ideas for awhile but I don't see how they can apply to Rossi if you believe
the Ni---> Cu claims which were supposedly verified by the Swedes.
At one time I was going to try a MAHG replication but it turned out that Naudin made obvious errors
in his power measurements which he refused to correct. Is Naudin still active? In any case it
seems that it wouldn't be that hard to test your reaction scenario.
Ron
--On Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:19 AM -0400 "Roarty, Francis X"
<francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote:
Jones,
I agree with most of what you are saying even that we still "dispute" the need
to "makeup"
chemical energy released by catalytic disassociation. ZPE is absolutely based
on a negative
potential but once you provide a method to rectify this energy (Heisenberg
trap) it operates on
the absolute difference between two potentials which is positive energy. My
point is that some
energy can be derived solely from ZPE and chemistry without the need for any
nuclear reactions
and it could even be of a similar scale. I think this is what Moller and Naudin
were pursuing
with the MAHG device. We have been programmed to accept that the ZPE in gas
motion cannot be
exploited because we assumed gravity is isotropic but that changes in Cavity
QED where we can
suddenly exploit differences in inertial frames without the need for near
luminal velocity...in
fact what "velocity" there is to move the h1 and h2 between frames is provided
gratis by the
constant motion of gas[ZPE]. If you add in the "relativistic" interpretation of
Casimir effect
the "frequency" of these disassociations suddenly scales at an almost unlimited
rate [terahertz
+] based on A/a^4 [plate area over separation^4] . That's why I was trying to
find a form of the
time dilation formula[Gamma] already solving for force so I could make it
directly equal to the
Casimir formula and get an idea for just how much acceleration and how
dynamically it changes
inside the array of geometry created by "real" Casimir materials. Once the
formulas for positive
changes in energy density [Gamma] seen in near luminal objects are related to
negative changes
seen in nano geometry [Casimir] it becomes possible to solve in terms of each
other's variables.
I think rapid changes in equivalent acceleration [jerk] occur due to Casimir
geometry and are
responsible for the property we call catalytic disassociation. The time
dilation would locally
mask the equivalent acceleration we calculate outside the cavity BUT the
accumulating velocity
would rapidly sling shot the gas between an array of different inertial frames
formed by the
tapestry where the gas momentum would keep finding itself in violent opposition
to the changing
magnitude and vector of the negative acceleration [quantum blender]. I don't
expect you to agree
but still argue it is a valid possibility. Regards
Fran
Jones Beene wrote on Wednesday, April 27, 2011 6:40 PM
[snip]To put this all into the average vortician's perspective, Fran and a few
others on vortex believe that the Casimir force and therefore ZPE are
intimately involved in both the Mills' reaction and in "lattice assisted
nuclear fusion" and in the Rossi effect. "Nano" is the key word. Or "FRET"
if you are a bit more sophisticated on the theoretical end.
That would be LANR, in contrast to LENR, but the two are essentially the
same animal from different perspectives. The zero point field can provide a
force which can provide net thermal energy under certain narrow conditions,
if at high repetition rate. But for the long term, the excess energy must be
replaced periodically by a nuclear process. The Mills' reaction can be
reconciled with this, if one accepts that he cuts short the progression
intentionally.
CANR or "chemically assisted" is another way of saying the same thing- that
valence electrons (i.e. chemistry) can influence nuclear reactions,
especially when there is cavity confinement so that interactions with
valence electrons are accelerated; and to the extent that the "improbable
become probable" due to the extreme number of sequential transactions
(terahertz).
The key to all of it is hydrogen going from molecular to atomic and back. H2
is tightly bound. A spillover catalyst breaks that bond catalytically and
actually extracts heat to do it. That is not in dispute. A net energy
asymmetry in this process is only possible when there is a nuclear process
which can provide the "makeup". (That is the dispute) The best way that I
can verbalize the 'Rossi effect', but others have their own perspectives on
it - is that it is a hybrid ZPE/nuclear process.
[/snip]
