Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote:

> I do not think that any of the arguments against Rossi have merit,
>> especially not the ones that attempt to disprove the 18-hour flowing water
>> test.
>>
>
> What test? What exactly was done, what data was generated?
>

The data provided can be found here:

http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm

This data is similar to what you find on a boiler test form, filled in by an
inspector. It is no less detailed than that. No sensible person would
suggest that such tests are inadequate, or that there is some reason why
they might be wrong. They are, of course, imprecise. As it says on the
guides to these forms, the results are plus or minus 10%. If those tests did
not work, in every major city dozens of boilers would explode every day.
That does not happen.



> We have seen how the public demonstrations turned out to have hidden
> problems . . .


No, we have not. All of the "hidden problems" are figments of the overworked
imaginations of people who have never done such tests, and who do not know
what they are talking about.

Any HVAC engineer will know that this test is valid, and that all of the
objections to it raised here are nonsense.

- Jed

Reply via email to