>As was previously theorized, Rossi may have really been onto something. >Unfortunately, when the reaction occurs, it is difficult to keep stable; it >runs away and needs to be quenched.
Robert, Rossi made 58 of “difficult to keep stable” modules and put together. If reaction is so instable, nobody will made a central. I think that the end of the hoax is approaching. From: Robert Leguillon Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 9:11 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news) My two cents: As was previously theorized, Rossi may have really been onto something. Unfortunately, when the reaction occurs, it is difficult to keep stable; it runs away and needs to be quenched. If you recall, the Defkalion rumors centered around a nonpayment from Defkalion until Rossi achieved stability. In an effort to "tame the cat", and "make it safe" he had tried to find a lower-power stable setup. But, he only really achieved stability when it WASN'T WORKING. By failing to do proper calorimetry and use proper controls, he'd fooled himself into thinking it's running smoothly when it isn't running at all. If Krivit's sources are correct (it is worth reading the entire NET article), NASA really sounds quite excited about LENR, and appears to have made great strides in successful replication. I just wish that they would publish their results openly. They successfully saw anomalous heat in 1989, but were afraid to admit it, until now: ""Tests conducted at NASA Glenn Research Center in 1989 and elsewhere consistently showed evidence of anomalous heat during loading and unloading deuterium into bulk palladium. At one time called “cold fusion,” now called “low-energy nuclear reactions” (LENR), such effects are now published in peer-reviewed journals and are gaining attention and mainstream respectability. The instrumentation expertise of NASA GRC is applied to improve the diagnostics for investigating the anomalous heat in LENR."" http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/sensors/PhySen/research.htm But, Krivit may be onto something. The NASA site I've linked above has the following soon-to-be-link at the bottom. ****+ Download presentation given at a LENR Workshop at NASA GRC in 2011 [available soon].**** LENR looks to really be gaining attention. Andrea Rossi may be lost to history, if only by his own behavior. Donating to the World - Two Cents at a Time, R.L. _______________________________________________________________________ > Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:00:25 +0200 > From: shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: [Vo]:Regarding Rossi and NASA (+ some Piantelli news) > > Hello Group, > > Have a read at Krivit's latest blog post here: > > NASA Advances Evaluation of Piantelli’s LENR Research > Short URL: http://goo.gl/Ei9jW > > (which is quite interesting and I recommend to read it entirely, > although that partially goes outside the scope of this thread). > > Excerpt from the end of the article: > > > On Sept. 5 and 6, a team comprising representatives from an investment > > group and NASA visited Andrea Rossi’s showroom in Bologna. The team went > > there with an explicit agreement about test parameters and opportunities to > > observe and evaluate Rossi’s claims. They did not observe any positive > > results. > > This isn't very encouraging news. Assuming that Krivit's sources are > correct, could this be the reason why Rossi is repeatedly denying any > involvement with NASA? Or maybe it's Krivit's misinterpretation of the > actual happenings instead? > > Cheers, > S.A. >
