We are going on this Scientific Way for 24= years and very interesting things were discovered. Howvever if we take in consideration that CF was seen from its very start as a potential new energy source, then Kitamura's way is not the good way. It is a very long way and if we enjoy more traveling than arriving it is OK, for energy a hybrid approach science and engineering is necessary. Kitamura's statement is mirrored by the very spirit of ICCF-18 and vice-versa. Peter
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com> wrote: > > From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com > > Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 8:21:55 PM > > From pesn.com --- > > > > JCF13 - Proc. of the 13th Meeting of Japan CF Research Soc., > > December 8 - 9, 2012 - WincAichi, Nagoya, Japan > > Japan CF-Research Society > > http://www.jcfrs.org/file/jcf13-proceedings.pdf > > Steady progress, nothing spectacular that I noticed. > > From the introduction : Recently, we find a few grandstanding activities > based apparently on commercial purposes on various internet sites. We > believe, however, that priority has to be given to clarification of the > underlying physics and development of scientifically firm and sound > technology. It is therefore very important for us to continue and further > develop scientific approach. > > Editor-in-Chief > Akira Kitamura, Technova Inc > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
