I agree. That pins it as not nuclear and not chemical. A different kind of
energy.
Do you think the fission guys and fusion guys would agree with its reality
any more than, if it were fission or fusion as they want to consider those
terms? That's probably why they do not mention Dirac's sea very often, even
though he was instrumental in developing quantum mechanics?
Bob
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terry Blanton" <hohlr...@gmail.com>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 9:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The "real" chemical energy of nascent hydrogen
Or maybe we should give credit where it is due and call it "Positronic
Energy", a la Asimov.
