Axi and Jones-- Thanks. That's sure seems to be an indication that magnetic fields are important in the control of the Cravens/Gimpel National Instruments Expo experiment. They believed that they were producing He. Like Jones said it would be nice to know if they measured He and, if so how and how much. Also did they measure HE or HE?
Jones indicated that the energy spectrum is flat at the temperature that the test was run. That may be true, but the driving or resonate frequencies may be at the upper end of the frequency spectrum associated with the initiation of the reaction and the NAE couple to the charcoal matrix. A broad band of frequency may may make the necessary coupling more unlikely. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 8:41 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: Co-Netic AA and the Dirac sea The referenced article at the top of this thread as follows: http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: Axil-- Which IE article regarding magnetism are you referring to? Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Axil Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 5:00 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: Co-Netic AA and the Dirac sea The item below is an idem of interest in the IE article regarding magnetism. "an empirical model by Dennis Letts was used...“A Method to Calculate Excess Power”... predicts that the heat production is linearly proportional to the mass of the hydrogen-containing material and the magnetic field surrounding the mass." On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: From: Jed Rothwell That is fun to read! Good experiment. Good write up. Yes it is a fabulous, simple experiment that is ripe for both replication and improvement. And it is somewhat poignant for those who have followed the field for a while, to mention Les Case – whose shadow looms over this experiment. Here is an old article from Gene: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MalloveEreproducib.pdf … showing the spherical reactor, which turns up once again. Notably Cravens (IIRC) purchased the Lab gear from Case’s estate. And he is still using carbon of some form, as did Case. Quote: The bulk of the material inside the active sphere is activated charcoal (carbon). The charcoal has a mesh of between 1350 and 2000 (micro mesh screening of 6 to 10 microns)…. That was selected to match the 8.2 micron peak wavelength of black body radiation at 80°C [i.e. spectral radiance of about 0.02 W/(cm2)]. The charcoal’s pores holding the metal alloy are nominally 9 nm. That is very low spectral radiance, and to say that there is any peak at all at this temperature is strange, as the “curve” is essentially flat. Plus the value seems to be off. Nevertheless, the proof is in the pudding… and the active sphere worked for months at substantial gain. That is the incredible part. The big question I have for Dennis, or his first replicator, is what gases turn up in the ash after a long run? As the active ball was cut open at the end of the Demo to show no battery was inside, the accumulated gases were not analyzed at NI Week. Les Case thought he was seeing helium but was he? Mizuno has presented a paradigm shift with his discovery of hydrogen showing up in place of deuterium. Is that a trend, of a sort, now that we have an appreciation that it is possible? Was past evidence of D->2H deliberately ignored, since that reaction seems so improbable that the experimenter ignored it for sake of his own credibility? If the Mizuno finding were to be validated in another type of experiment then it may finally be possible to approach an operating theory which will appeal to the more hard-headed of skeptics. The skeptics I know will never buy into the helium spiel without some show of strong gamma photons – due to helium’s ubiquity… and given the recent Mizuno results – where a former proponent of helium is now (effectively) recanting - we may be seeing a major change in outlook. Who will be the next to confirm this? Or will it die a slow death?
