It is not one spectral line Mills is showing, it's a battery that matches theory quite well. Now if we want to be critical consider, * Is it slightly above noise, was the shown spectral lines a one in a hundred or even worse spectral capture? * Is theory predicting hundreds of spectral lines and a suitable subset is being picked?
If both of these objections are moot I think that the spectral fingerprint being the result of a nano structure have no bearing that would be very very improbable. On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > For nanoparticles, localized surface plasmon dipole oscillations can give > rise to a large range of intense colors of suspensions or sols containing > the nanoparticles. Nanoparticles and nanowires exhibit strong absorption > and emission bands in the ultraviolet-visible light regime that are not > present in the bulk metal. The hydrino spectrum emissions are in the > ultraviolet. The energy (color) of this absorption differ when the light > is polarized along or perpendicular to the nanowire. > > Certain chemical reactions can produce nano-structures which will emit > light in the 10nm range. Nano-structures are regularly used to up-shift or > down shift light to varied wavelengths. > > For example, carbon nanotubes can take on any color base on their > dimensions. > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:26 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mills spectral evidences is pretty thorough and I can't understand that >> if true, it came from some other mysterious process. >> It match very well with the theoretical lines. It also looks like these >> fingerprints have been verified by third parties. But I can't find >> their reports for this at the website, I'm not English speaking, but I >> got the impressions that at least three 3'd parties stated that >> the reaction did show evidences of hydrino. So in a sense we need wait >> for the reports regarding this to see how well they replicated. >> I personally can't imagine that Mills is faking all this information, >> therefore i'm quite positive, BLP should now want the hydrino evidences >> to be replicated so I guess that we should get more and better >> verification documents later on. >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I wrote: >>> >>> spectroscopy at Harvard CfA showed evidence (and several possible >>>> artifacts) of continuum radiation in the 10-30 nm range from low-energy ... >>>> >>> >>> There is a further lack of clarity as to the employer of the >>> spectropists. Were they GEN3 subcontractors with no affiliation to Harvard >>> CfA who were permitted to use its facilities, perhaps by renting a machine >>> for a short period of time? The careful wording of the preamble to the >>> report leaves open a range of possibilities. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >> >
