I've seen Rossi deny Windom Larson -- which is interesting given that he says he wants to give no information on the underlying theory -- but I haven't seen a denial of Mills's GUToCP from Rossi.
Has he let such a denial slip? On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > As for the patent which most resembles the Hot-Cat, it is probably > this one: “Molecular hydrogen laser” US 7773656 to Mills. Of course, > Rossi’s device is not a laser, but in operation it is closer than you may > realize - unless you have followed the SPP discussions. > > > > A picture is worth 1000 words… > > > > > http://fusionfroide.ch/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Rossis-HOT-CAT-reactor.jpg > > > > … and no, there is no indication that the photons seen here are coherent, > or even superradiant. No evidence is possible since there is no lens. The > IR light is coming through and/or heating a stainless steel end-cap. If the > electrical input power is as low as claimed, then we are probably seeing > superradiance, at least. >
