And so says Reed Hedges on 07/09/05 10:08...
> Lalo Martins wrote:
> Why use wxConvCurrent instead of wxConvUTF8? I got the impression from
> the wx docs that wxConvCurrent depends on the (GUI) platform, so on a
> unicode platform you'd be telling it your strings from VOS were unicode,
> when they aren't. I only read the wx docs with a normal depth, no
> backwards bending, maybe I am wrong :)
I copied this verbatim from some examples in the documentation, so I may
be wrong, but from what I understand:
wxConvCurrent may be the appropriate conversion to turn a (char) string
into unicode (wxConvUTF8), if your build is unicode-enabled; or it will
be a dummy conversion otherwise. So this expression returns unicode
when it needs unicode, and single-byte when it needs single-byte.
So many of our dreams at first seem impossible,
then they seem improbable, and then, when we
summon the will, they soon become inevitable.
http://www.exoweb.net/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNU: never give up freedom http://www.gnu.org/
vos-d mailing list