-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Peter Amstutz wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Lalo Martins wrote: >>> Or in other words - why would I use the existing swig stuff? :-) > > > I think that you will find that in the long run that SWIG is much more > maintainable that keeping up a set of bindings by hand. ...etc.
Pete, have you *tried* to modify the swig interface file? It's really quite difficult and not easily maintainable without being a Swig guru. OR maybe our interface file is just messed up. Anyway, not to say that Swig isn't the solution for the most *complete* binding, but if Lalo needs to do it *now* in order to implement usable scripting for message handlers and listeners, then that's more important. Reed -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD6+xtFK83gN8ItOQRAofGAJ9ZaD8ZNWkw44TZX0+FgObLX054bQCfZg3b p29V+i9liph+yRrDoNnZBBw= =7/kS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list vos-d@interreality.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
