-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Peter Amstutz wrote:
> Yea, it sounds like Lalo has something different in mind, so perhaps the > way to go is to go ahead with two different Python bindings and > eventually have a "bake-off" to decide which is better :-)\ Lalo, ideally your API would be almost the same as the existing bindings (except extended to be more "Pythonic" where appropriate), do you think? Reed -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD7qllFK83gN8ItOQRAsOuAJ9fqdsgFxhwZbRDognGu/0jiFi0PgCfQ4ux Hm992lePHT44Dv7qinoT2Uo= =gsfy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list vos-d@interreality.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
