Hi Alan:

You've expressed what most of the content community I know 
expresses or has expressed, so you aren't alone.  The only 
consolation I have to offer is that if the design goes down 
the NG route, some things will get better, hopefully:

o  Components - not having to support the whole spec 
in one bundle should get efficiencies in the parts that 
are supported.  At least for those who do use it, they 
can target what they need better.  

o  Services - if the components work well AND (big if) 
the browser framework improves, the 3D is part of the 
framework and gets better use of system services.  That 
means if the audio improves in the browser AND synchronization 
services are there, the 3D gets the advantage when the 
text app does.  Keep our fingers crossed.

o  XML - this part isn't hard.  3D tags will look just 
like HTML tags will look just like 2D tags, etc.  It is just  
a file format.  This may help the "geekSpeak" problem 
of VRML.  In other words, same scripting, same interfaces, 
same syntax; what you learn for one applies to the others, 
so the surface area of the learning comes down.

If this all works, then hopefully we get more content, better 
content, and a wider community.  At that point, geeks 
can keep on speaking geek and everyone else can 
go on making content.  The situation with HTML and 
the SGML applications that preceded it went something 
like that.   We can't fix 3D in that if one can't think or use 
3D, one can't model with it.  We can get it into the mainstream 
of web technologies and get it the same advantages.  

I will do my best to help those of you who find XML 
daunting.  It really is easier than VRML and once 
you understand it, it works the same for all of its 
applications.  If I worry about the X3D plans, I worry 
about politics and performance.  I can't avoid or fix 
the first worry and just consider it part of life.  The second 
part I can't fix because I don't build browsers, so have 
to hope like everyone else.  Again, this is the NG Gamble.

Len 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Taylor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> 
>       
> For those of you reading this far - thanks for bearing with this rant, I'd
> love to hear from you too,
> -Alan Taylor
> 
> 

Reply via email to