Re: webdav wagon changes

[Brett Porter]

On 22/05/2008, at 12:03 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote:

Currently, my organization is utilizing the default provider, so  
we'll have
to add additional bits to all of our POMs to take advantage of the  
provider
that's NOT of the EOL path. The default provider for WebDAV is on EOL,
correct? Will the jackrabbit provider eventually become the default
provider?

You'd need to do that anyway to change the version, right?



I'd be more amenable to Jason's thinking if there was at least a  
loose plan
for what's going to happen, but frankly I'm still skeptical.

This is the discussion to come up with that plan :)

Sorry, I hadn't seen your other message before I last posted. But this  
is what I propose:
- rename to webdav-jackrabbit
- have no -webdav module in the final release
- make sure wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-2 works with the new API, but  
discourage it's use

WDYT?

The wagon
development/community is so isolated, non-responsive and slow I'm  
skeptical
of anything going on here. Does wagon development discussion only  
happen on
IRC?

There wasn't anything going on here. That's why I'm currently going  
through all the issues, and posting to the list with anything  
controversial.

I hope that if we have a 1.0 release, and JIRA is not full of old  
issues that you can't see the forest for the trees, it'll be easier to  
respond to patches and such as they arrive. Thanks for the patches you  
personally submitted, btw - and sorry we didn't get to them sooner.

Cheers,
Brett

--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]