Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:15:34 +0100, Shelley Powers <[email protected]> wrote:
And regardless of the fact that I jumped to conclusions about WhatWG membership, I do not believe I was inaccurate with the earlier part of this email. Sam started a new thread in the discussion about the issues of namespace and how, perhaps we could find a way to work the issues through with RDFa. My god, I use RDFa in my pages, and they load fine with any browser, including IE. I have to believe its incorporation into HTML5 is not the daunting effort that others make it seem to be.'

You ask us to take you seriously and consider your feedback, it would be nice if you took what e.g. Henri wrote seriously as well. Integrating a new feature in HTML is not a simple task, even if the new feature loads and renders fine in Internet Explorer.

Take you guys seriously...OK, yeah.

I don't doubt that the work will be challenging, or problematical. I'm not denying Henri's claim. And I didn't claim to be the one who would necessarily come up with the solutions, either, but that I would help in those instances that I could.

What I did express in the later emails, is what others have expressed who have asked about RDFa in HTML5: are we wasting our time even trying? That it seems like a decision has already been made, and we're spinning our wheels even attempting to find solutions. There's a difference between not being willing to negotiate, compromise, work the problem, and just spitting into the wind for no good.

However, the debate ended as soon as Ian re-asserted his authority.

Ian just gave an indication of when he's going to work on this again. That doesn't mean that research into e.g. DOM consistency can't happen meanwhile. It also doesn't mean that debate needs to stop.


No, Ian's listing of tasks pretty much precluded any input into the decision making process other than his own. I never see "we" when Ian writes, I only see "I".

Regardless, perhaps Dan or Ben have better arguments than I do to input into the debate. I'm not helping.

Shelley

Reply via email to