Dera Patrick, Dear David , dearest all: Nowadays, there is an agreement this may become an sterile debate, if the issue is that there is no time to invest, neither and agreement on what should be done.
I propose, if there is any interest on the matter we are arguing, to open a branch, and those of us who have the will, who see the need, and dispose of some spare time to invest in a possible solution ( to be presented in a future as an enhancement or a recommendation), put our hands to work. Count me in, _if there is a small group of devoted volunteers who want to extend or put his hands dirt as an __exercise,_ for file and ftp URLs [6 [6]] in the fetch spec featured in WHATWG. Sundays I'm on. Regards --- Delfi Ramirez -- At Work My digital signature [1] 0034 633 589231 del...@segonquart.net [2] twitter: @delfinramirez [3] IRC: segonquart Skype: segonquart [4] http://segonquart.net http://delfiramirez.info [5] On 2017-04-14 20:45, Patrick Dark wrote: > David Kendal 於 4/14/2017 11:58 AM 寫道: On 11 Apr 2017, at 19:50, Patrick Dark > <whatwg.at.whatwg....@patrick.dark.name> wrote: > > The "world wide web" is the user-facing portion of the Internet. Files > on a CD or USB drive are not part of that. You are continuing to dodge this > problem by redefining the WHAT WG's > responsibilities. Please don't do that. > > If you can't take my word for it, how about the inventor of the > web itself? <https://gitter.im/solid/chat?at=58ed246d408f90be66aeeb30> > (Thanks to a correspondent, who I presume prefers to remain unnamed, > for sending this to me off-list.) "Appeal to authority" is a logical fallacy. An authoritative source doesn't make an argument true. I disagree with the idea that HTML files on offline media or a closed intranet are part of the "world wide web". Links: ------ [1] http://delfiramirez.info/public/dr_public_key.asc [2] mail:%20del...@segonquart.net [3] https://twitter.com/delfinramirez [4] skype:segonquart [5] http://delfiramirez.info [6] https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-url
