wireshark-dev  

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 31774: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-clnp.c packet-p_mul.c packet-tcp.c packet-x25.c

Stig Bjørlykke
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:47:36 -0800

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> NDS's "Reassembled length" field is in generated code; the generator is 
> tools/ncp2222.py.  I've updated that.

We have some other dissectors with just "Reassembled length", the plan
was to match this with the name of the data source.

> Should the field names be "{proto}.reassembled.length", or 
> "{proto}.reassembled_length"?  Do we expect to have other fields with 
> information associated with the reassembly?

We also have "{proto}.reassembled.in" vs. "{proto}.reassembled_in", I
just used the same syntax as in each dissectors for the length.
I'll change to "reassembled.length".


-- 
Stig Bjørlykke
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe