didier
Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:22:19 -0800
Hi,
Le mercredi 03 février 2010 à 09:45 +0100, Stig Bjørlykke a écrit :
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:33 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> > NDS's "Reassembled length" field is in generated code; the generator is
> > tools/ncp2222.py. I've updated that.
>
> We have some other dissectors with just "Reassembled length", the plan
> was to match this with the name of the data source.
>
> > Should the field names be "{proto}.reassembled.length", or
> > "{proto}.reassembled_length"? Do we expect to have other fields with
> > information associated with the reassembly?
A 'Reassembled by' field would be helpful when a PDU isn't fully
reassembled.
It's an issue when a heuristic dissector wrongly grab a conversation, often it finds a big PDU length and there's no easy way to know which dissector is the culprit. Didier ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe