Maybe if I have time to go through the cache execute code I can implement
something like this. Otherwise, since the full and redist package have the
same license could you live with only being able to set the license on one
package?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Bob Arnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22-Oct-14 19:50, Sean Hall wrote:
> > I really think that the feature of using the full redist package when
> > available, and the web package as a fallback, should be in the engine.
> Maybe. I'm not sure how common it is, though, whether it's something
> important/common enough to earn a spot in the engine.
>
> > http://wixtoolset.org/issues/4183/ asks for the payload info to be
> > separated from the package. The way I interpret that is to designate
> > one of the child payloads as the PackagePayload and remove all of the
> > payload attributes from the XxxPackage element. Then to implement the
> > web package fallback, there would be another special payload, like
> > WebPayload or AlternatePackagePayload.
> That could work too. We also always have the fallback of a magic
> variable, which might be appropriate for an edge case like this.
>
> --
> sig://boB
> http://joyofsetup.com/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> WiX-devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
WiX-devs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-devs
