Andrew Sione Taumoefolau
Mon, 31 May 2004 07:28:29 -0700
> but other images which are basically decoration, I have placed > within the CSS <div> tags as background images. Is this o.k > to do as long as the images don't have any specific meaning to > the content? I say yes! I do the same thing to prevent older browsers from showing images that are purely presentational. I think it's better to have a little meaningless semantic noise in your code than to expose useless visual noise to browsers that support images but don't support CSS. Cheers, Andrew Taumoefolau ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************