Re: [WSG] Site Critique

[Chris Stratford]

Hey Wasabi,
Well, the layout is tight - I guess your trying to make it a fixed width 
layout that will work in a 600*480...
Which Personally  - I think is Overkill re: support...

Anyone with that low resolution will be very used to their friend the 
horizontal scroll bar.

The tabs look a lot like www.experts-exchange.com just not blue...
Personally - I think the logo could be more - especially when below the 
fold there are a lot of images.
the title is kind of drowned out and looks forgotten.

The layout does look craped.
It ends up being very empty at the top...
and then all of a sudden a huge block of text, in a tiny box in the 
middle...
then lots of empty room below again.

Also your CSS doesnt validate 100%...
you need a default font or two (serif/san-serif)...
love the old pictures and the diner look.
hope my response can help you.
:)
great job!
- Chris Stratford
Wasabi wrote:
Hi,
After all of my inquiries, here are the goods or your review.
http://ckimedia.com
Please offer scorn and praise as warranted.
"Complexity is good, complicated is bad."
                    —Paolo Soleri
Chris
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************


******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Proud presenters of Web Essentials 04 http://we04.com/
Web standards, accessibility, inspiration, knowledge
To be held in Sydney, September 30 and October 1, 2004
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************