David Dorward
Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:54:23 -0700
On 11 Aug 2008, at 15:14, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
David Dorward wrote:It doesn't really reject it, it just warns you that the combination doesn't make much sense.Sigh. Semantics. That was one suggested DOCTYPE that I found -- and no, I'm not sure at this point where -- but regardless, do you know the answer to the *original question*: When will the W3C validator support ARIA?
As I said "Now".
Or, if you believe it already does, what is the appropriate DOCTYPE to use?
Umm. What does the spec say? http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/ says: <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+ARIA 1.0//EN""http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-aria-1.dtd ">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
xml:lang="en">
...
</html>
--
David Dorward
http://dorward.me.uk/
http://blog.dorward.me.uk/
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************