[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:10:33 -0700
No, instead of developing new ways to write markup, they need to get into agreement (finally) of what the standards are truly going to be.
I for one am tired of writing up code for different browser's and having to hack code around to make things work.
What we need to be doing is pushing the vendor's into getting it right. James Jeffery wrote:
Never really heard of ARIA until I came across it in a Web Development magazine (.net mag). I have just spent a few hours getting my head around it, and whilst I agree it looks useful for screen readers and such, isn't it less semantic?Applying attributes that would currently make your markup invalid is something which I am not happy about. Along with that, using <span> to create a checkbox seems less semantic than using form elements.Is ARIA markup only supposed to be used with browsers who have JS enabled or sites that use alot of JS for dynamic content? What about browsers that don't support ARIA markup?I'm only dipping my feet in the water at the moment so I probably don't fully understand, but from what I have read so far it seems a bit wishy washy at the moment.Any replies appreciated. ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]*******************************************************************
******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************