Christian Snodgrass
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:49:27 -0800
Not a bad read.I'm about halfway in between your view and "accessibility all the time". I do agree that there is a lot of accessibility for the sake of accessibility, however, there are also lots of things that are so easy to do that they should always be done, even if your target market doesn't explicitly need that.
Thanks for the interesting read. - Christian On 1/29/2010 9:09 AM, Jason Grant wrote:
Hello friends, I was going to post a big debate on 'Why accessibility doesn't matter' to this list, but have delegated it to a blog post on the similar subject instead. I feel there has been LOADS of 'accessibility is a must' type discussion on this list, but at the same time I feel that there is loads of arguments which are essentially 'accessibility for the sake of accessibility'. My point is that we are heading towards the times where 'relevant accessibility' is more important than 'accessibility' per se. Please have a read of my article and comment via email or on the blog itself. http://www.flexewebs.com/semantix/accessibility-does-not-matter/ Thank you very much. Regards, Jason
-- Christian Snodgrass CEO - Azure Ronin http://www.arwebdesign.net http://www.htmlblox.com Phone: 859.816.7955 ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************