wsg  

Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

Jason Grant
Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:18:39 -0800

@Chris
I couldn't resist this Sir.
Your site: http://chess.cfajohnson.com/
Uses two tables on the front page.
The first should be a <dl> and both are missing <thead> section. Poor
accessibility.
It's also an unusual practice to be putting inline images into an
<h1>, but at the very top you have <h1><a><img> construct going on.
HHmmm.
Anyway. Back to my shell script. ;-)

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Jason Grant <ja...@flexewebs.com> wrote:
> @Chris F. A. Johnson
> Once again, the site only looks rubbish for most part and is still
> accessible with larger font size. How do you propose overcoming this
> issue with fixed width layouts. I don't want my site to look rubbish
> like your for 98% of my users. Also with CSS switched off the site's
> content is perfectly visible with whatever default font size.
>
> @Thierry Koblentz
> 'Could' is not something we should be developing for. We need to know
> who we are developing for, otherwise it's a bit of a hit and miss.
>
> @Patrick H. Lauke
> 'Full accessibility' to me means a fully functional site with JS
> switched off, with all visual goodies in place of course (contrast,
> flexible font size and so on) according to WCAG1.0, to which we have
> so far been working. When web apps context comes in, meeting these
> WCAG1.0 becomes a massive burden and extra work.
>
> Clients issue - I am usually not developing for Santa Clause. Clients
> essentially rule the game and set the constraints which I need to
> meet. I am not going to invent constraints or drop anything that
> client requires. If they tell me 'code for IE6 only' I will tell them
> 'but IE8 is already in use and IE9 is round the corner, so IE6 is way
> beyond it's use by date, so I would not recommend what you suggest
> under any circumstances' and they tell me that I should not worry, I
> am not going to be an idiot enough to be pushing my issue as it tends
> to simply piss people off and make me look bad in the eyes of
> everyone.
>
> JS issue. When writing this article for most part I *was* thinking
> about JS vs. no-JS matters. To implement a proper progressively
> enhanced solution for a complex web app it really does take lots of
> thinking and additional (possibly complex) JS/AJAX code for it to
> work. I haven't got that time to do it with the app I am currently
> developing.
>
> Coincidentally can someone send me a complex-ish web app using JS that
> has been 'properly developed' with regards to accessibility? Anything
> in the wild will do. Yahoo used to taut Flickr as one, but it isn't.
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Chris F.A. Johnson
> <ch...@cfajohnson.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Jason Grant wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to people who have commented via blog and email.
>> ...
>>> @Chris F.A. Johnson That page is accessible, it just looks shit in the
>>> browser you tested in (whatever you have used there - would have nice
>>> to have test environment details).
>>
>>   The only environment detail that matters is the font size. You
>>   haven't allowed for users with a different default font size -- and
>>   that *is* a matter of accessibility.
>>
>>> I don't care. Content is visible
>>> and accessible. I am not intending to support everything under the Sun
>>> under my blog.
>>
>>   Why not? It's more work to prevent it working everywhere than it is
>>   to *let* it work everywhere.
>>
>> --
>>   Chris F.A. Johnson                          <http://cfajohnson.com>
>>   ===================================================================
>>   Author:
>>   Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
>>   Pro Bash Programming: Scripting the GNU/Linux Shell (2009, Apress)
>>
>>
>> *******************************************************************
>> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
>> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
>> Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
>> *******************************************************************
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jason Grant BSc, MSc
> CEO, Flexewebs Ltd.
> www.flexewebs.com
> ja...@flexewebs.com
> +44 (0)7748 591 770
> Company no.: 5587469
>
> www.flexewebs.com/semantix
> www.twitter.com/flexewebs
> www.linkedin.com/in/flexewebs
>



-- 
Jason Grant BSc, MSc
CEO, Flexewebs Ltd.
www.flexewebs.com
ja...@flexewebs.com
+44 (0)7748 591 770
Company no.: 5587469

www.flexewebs.com/semantix
www.twitter.com/flexewebs
www.linkedin.com/in/flexewebs


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************