Re: [WSG] Accessibility does not matter!

[Chris F.A. Johnson]

On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Jason Grant wrote:

> @Chris F. A. Johnson
> Once again, the site only looks rubbish for most part and is still
> accessible with larger font size.

     But even that is unnecessary; there's no good reason not to have
     it look good for everyone.

> How do you propose overcoming this issue with fixed width layouts.

     Don't use fixed-width layouts.
     <http://cfaj/cfajohnson.com/webdesign/fixed-width/>

> I don't want my site to look rubbish like your for 98% of my users.

     What, pray tell, looks like rubbish? What doesn't work for 99% of
     viewers?

> Also with CSS switched off the site's content is perfectly visible
> with whatever default font size.

     One would certainly hope so! Now take it that tiny step further
     and make it work for everyone no matter what their default font
     size.

-- 
   Chris F.A. Johnson                          <http://cfajohnson.com>
   ===================================================================
   Author:
   Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
   Pro Bash Programming: Scripting the GNU/Linux Shell (2009, Apress)


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************