In this week's links for light reading, there is a reference to responsive images, eg:
http://www.netmagazine.com/features/road-responsive-images I'd be interested to hear this lists' opinion on the proposed syntax. To me this screams of putting styling information, into the document. For comparison, we now use media queries to change font sizes and element locations, based on viewport size and/or direction. I would have expected responsive images to be implemented in a similar manner, not with new html tags. In other words, an <img src=...> is descriptive of the target image, and we add alt-attributes to describe it as such. Simply showing a higher quality image of the same thing, shouldn't change the document structure. Thoughts? Mathew Robertson ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
