Jürgen Schmitz
Sat, 11 May 2002 08:49:20 -0700
Well, the idea of the automatic book is to make live easier - automatic. For example if I receive emails from a customer I don't want to add him to my addressbook but sometimes I need to write him some days later when I already removed his mail or it was moved to the received folder. So in this case I always have to press a button to add this address - which I won't do. However, the automatic book can be disabled in the general prefs. Maybe a feature should be added to remove old entries or not ofter used addresses from the automatic book. But that's not that easy. Different books a all is a problem - the object design is not made for this and so would require a big change in the whole program (or all parts where an addressbook is used). Jürgen David Pilgram wrote: > Dear Jürgen, > > At the moment there appears to be a private and an automatic addressbook > for xcmail. Personally, I'm not convinced by the automatic one, it > contains errors (e.g. when I mis-typed an email address, it turns up in > there), and sometimes parses addresses incorrectly. > > I said in an earlier thread that instead of an automatic book, there > should be the choice to add the new address into the existing book(s). > But that this feature is, itself, optional (just like the automatic book > is now). > > ----No: Do nothing. > | > Automatic ---| ---No: Do nothing > Entries | | > ____Yes: ---On new email address---| > Add to addressbook | > | ---Yes: Add to [selected] > addressbook. > > Hope that explains what I mean. > > BUT still have more than one addressbook, e.g. Personal and Work, which is > why I put in [selected] in the tree above. > > Some people may want an addressbook that they can then email between say > work and home, and keep updated; make *one* of those available to do so. > > I'm reasonably happy with the way that I made two accounts share > addressbooks, but it's not perfect, and occasionally an update is > over-written by and older version when the other account closes down. A > small drawback to a much larger advantage. But the email-able version may > also be able to be used in this guise as well. > > Regards, > > David Pilgram. >