On 2017-04-06 07:31, Ulrike Fischer wrote: > Am Thu, 6 Apr 2017 07:10:06 -0600 schrieb Bobby de Vos: > >> On 2017-04-06 02:39, Ulrike Fischer wrote: >>> On the whole I would agree with the debian answer: applications like >>> xetex/xdvipdfmx shouldn't try to use fonts it can't handle. >> Thank you for your response. I will file a bug with Debian at some point. > Why Debian? I meant it is more a xetex problem so I would add a bug > report there.
Sorry for the confusion. I asked about woff files on a Debian email list, and the response [1] was I should file a bug report against the package that was choking on the woff files. That package would be the package containing XeTeX. So I agree, not a Debian bug, but Debian would receive a bug against the XeTeX package, and presumably forward that bug to the XeTeX maintainers (which I would imagine are on this xetex list already). [1] https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-fonts-devel/2017-April/019338.html > >> where do I put the extension? I can place the font name in brackets [], >> and include the extension, but then I need to supply the entire path to >> the font file. > You don't need the full path. This here works fine for me (arial is > a system font and the other is in the texmf tree): > > \font\test="[arial.ttf]:color=FF0000;mapping=tex-text" at 20pt > \test > alblbl --- I had missed that, thank you for pointing it out to me. Bobby -- Bobby de Vos /devos.bo...@gmail.com/
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex