Lawrence Gold
Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:36:49 -0800
For some reason, the line that gcc is complaining about is setting an integer equal to NULL, which is usually defined to be a zero-valued pointer. Don't know why they didn't just set it to 0. It's probably just an oversight. At any rate, it shouldn't cause any problems besides the compiler warning. On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 03:32:42PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > src/cheat.c: In function `RestoreSearch': > src/cheat.c:2115: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer without a > cast > > It doesn't appear to affect anything. That I'm using, anyway.... --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]