chris lau
Sun, 28 Jan 2007 16:18:40 -0800
Okay, thanks. It's no big deal if no messages are lost. The server is pretty
slow since it is a PII 266mhz 192mb of RAM (test server) so I'm not surprised.
----- Original Message ----
From: Marcel Ruff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: xmlblaster@server.xmlBlaster.org
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 5:01:20 AM
Subject: Re: [xmlblaster] Annoying Warning about recv failed
The warning
an 21, 2007 4:29:29 PM WARNING 19-XmlBlaster.SOCKET RL10
org.xmlBlaster.protocol.socket.HandleClient run: Error parsing TCP data from
'/192.168.1.102:4178', check if client and server have identical compression or
SSL settings: java.net.socketException: Software caused connection abort: recv
failed
is emitted when the socket handle throws an exception.
It could happen when the client closes the socket very quickly
before the server has processed a disconnect.
But it can also be a hint for a misbehaving client.
If you want to suppress it try the command line (or xmlBlaster.properties entry)
-logging/org.xmlBlaster.protocol.socket.HandleClient SEVERE
Marcel
chris lau wrote:
> okay, I did some testing on my webservice. What I found out is really
> bizarre. Basically, I stripped the webservice down to a simple
> connect as in the following code:
>
> I_XmlBlasterAccess con = null;
> Global glob = null;
>
> try {
> glob = new Global();
>
> con = glob.getXmlBlasterAccess();
>
> ConnectQos qos = new ConnectQos(glob);
> qos.setSessionName(new SessionName(glob, "test_publisher"));
>
> System.out.println ("Connecting");
> con.connect(qos, null);
>
> } catch (XmlBlasterException e) {
> } finally {
> System.out.println ("Disconnecting");
>
> try { Thread.sleep(1000); } catch (InterruptedException e) {}
>
> if (con != null) {
> if (con.isConnected())
> con.disconnect(new DisconnectQos(glob));
> }
> }
>
> In the finally section, I upped the sleep time to 5000 instead of 1000 so I
> could tell when the disconnect would happen and when the recv-failed message
> appeared. It looks like the recv-failed message appears on disconnect. So to
> confirm this, I commented out the disconnect and the message doesn't appear
> after the client quits. I did this a few times to confirm.
>
> I then added another Thread.sleep command of 5 seconds right after the
> disconnect so I could confirm that it was the disconnect command causing this
> warning. After looking at the blaster console I was able to count 5 seconds,
> then the recv-failed message appears, then counted another 5 seconds, and my
> client program resumes from it's call to the webservice.
>
> Is there anyway I coded the disconnect call wrong?
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com