Analisis tentang Perang AS-Irak tidak ada habis-habisnya.
Ada yang bermutu dan ada yang konyol.
Yang konyol, tapi lucu dibacanya, adalah analisis paranormal.
Dan ternyata di Amerika ada paranormal juga lho!
Bedanya di sana paranormal-nya bergelar doktor (PhD), jadi lebih
'canggih' gayanya...
Pernah penelitian lapangan di TimTim lagi.

Wasalam.

==================================================

http://www.exopolitics.org/Study-Paper2.htm

An Exopolitical Perspective on the Preemptive War against Iraq

Research Study #2
February 3, 2003,
© Dr Michael E. Salla

----------------------------------------------------------------------
------

Abstract

Most, if not all, criticisms of the Bush administration's motivation
for
launching a preemptive war on Iraq focus on a combination of the
imperial
world views of conservative politicians in power in Washington, D.C.,
and
the corporate interests that drive the political agenda of the Bush
administration.
This study will provide a radically different political analysis of
the Bush
administration's motivation for going war, and of the explanations
offered
by his critics.
This study provides an exopolitical analysis of the policy dimensions
of an
historic extraterrestrial presence that is pertinent to Iraq and a US
led
preemptive attack.
It will be argued that competing clandestine government organizations
are
struggling through proxy means to take control of ancient
extraterrestrial
(ET) technology that exists in Iraq, in order to prepare for an
impending
series of events corresponding to the 'prophesied return' of an
advanced
race of ETs.
The Columbia Space Shuttle may well have been a high profile victim of
such
a proxy war intended to send a message to US based clandestine
organizations
over the preemptive war against Iraq.

In conducting this analysis, this study examines the available
evidence of
an historical ET presence in Iraq, and then applies this evidence to
better
understand the contemporary political situation in Iraq.
The study will then analyze the motivations of the main political
actors in
the prospective US led preemptive war against Iraq.
The study concludes by making some policy recommendations concerning
how to
respond to the legacy of an ET presence in Iraq and its contemporary
political relevance.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
----

About the Author

Dr. Michael E. Salla has held academic appointments in the School of
International Service, American University, Washington DC (1996-2001),
and
the Department of Political Science, Australian National University,
Canberra, Australia (1994-96).
He taught as an adjunct faculty member at George Washington
University,
Washington DC., in 2002.
He is currently researching methods of Transformational Peace as a
Researcher in Residence in the Center for Global Peace (2001-2003) and
directing the Center's Peace Ambassador Program which uses
transformational
peace techniques for individual self-empowerment.
He has a PhD in Government from the University of Queensland,
Australia, and
an MA in Philosophy from the University of Melbourne, Australia.
He is the author of The Hero's Journey Toward a Second American
Century
(Greenwood Press, 2002) and author/coeditor of three other books:
Essays on
Peace (Central Queensland University Press, 1995); Why the Cold War
Ended
(Greenwood Press, 1995); and Islamic Radicalism, Muslim Nations and
the West
(1993).
He has authored more than seventy articles, chapters, and book reviews
on
peace, ethnic conflict and conflict resolution.
He has conducted research and fieldwork in the ethnic conflicts in
East
Timor, Kosovo, Macedonia, and Sri Lanka.
He has organized a number of international workshops involving mid to
high
level participants from these conflicts.
He has a personal website at www.american.edu/salla/ .

----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
----

Introduction*

In his 2003 State of the Union address President George W. Bush
declared
"the gravest danger facing America and the world, is outlaw regimes
that
seek and possess nuclear, chemical and biological weapons." (1) In his
speech, President Bush eloquently expressed his main motivation for
launching a preemptive war against Iraq in order to prevent "a day of
horror
like none we have ever known." Critics of President Bush's preemptive
policy, including the political commentator, Robert Fisk, argue the
upcoming
US led war against Iraq "isn't about chemical warheads or human
rights: it's
about oil." (2) According to another prominent political commentator,
Michael Lind, the motivation lies in the preemptive military doctrine
championed by 'neo-conservatives' such as Deputy Defense Secretary
Paul
Wolfowitz, whose policy views were given more prominence after the
September
11 attack. (3)
Most, if not all, criticisms of the Bush administration's motivation
for
going to war focus on a combination of the imperial world views of
conservative politicians in power in Washington, D.C., and the
corporate
interests that drive the political agenda of the Bush administration.
This
paper will provide a radically different political analysis of the
Bush
administration's motivation for going war, and of the explanations
offered
by his critics. It will be argued that the focus on either the factors
supporting a preemptive war against an Iraq possessing weapons of mass
destruction; or on criticisms against US imperialism and corporate
interests, are not so much wrong, but simply reflect a limited
political
paradigm for understanding the motivations behind US foreign policy.

The political paradigm to be used in this paper is based on
'exopolitics'.
(4) This paradigm starts with the premise that there exists an
extraterrestrial (ET) presence on Earth which clandestine government
organizations have been withholding knowledge of from the general
public and
 elected public officials. Rather than being an unsubstantiated
'conspiracy
theory' with little relevance to contemporary policy issues such as a
preemptive US war against Iraq, it will be argued that an exopolitical
analysis can provide a more comprehensive understanding of what
motivates
the Bush administration in launching a preemptive attack against Iraq.
Exopolitics as an emerging field of public policy is primarily based
on the
evidence provided by a range of sources supporting the idea of an ET
presence that is known by clandestine government organizations that
suppress
this from the general public and elected political leaders. (5) The
most
important evidence comes from former military and government officials
who
have come forward to give 'whistle blower' testimony in a number of
non-governmental initiatives to promote disclosure of the ET presence.
(6)
While many disagree over the plausibility of the available evidence
and take
various positions either for or against the existence of an ET
presence and
government non-disclosure of this presence, exopolitics is based on
the
premise that such debate ought not preclude discussion of the
implications
of such a presence among policy makers and the general public.
Therefore
when one examines contemporary international issue such as a US led
preemptive war in Iraq, one can explore the viewpoints offered by
those
using an exopolitical analysis, and consider the plausibility of these
for a
more comprehensive understanding of foreign policy, irrespective of
the
ongoing debate over the persuasiveness of the available evidence. This
is
necessary since those actively involved in a non-disclosure program
will be
use disinformation, intimidation and other strategies to deter
witnesses,
distort evidence, and deter public attention from the ET presence and
how it
pertains to a range of contemporary policy issues. Finally, a
clandestine
campaign of non-disclosure needs to be considered in conducting
exopolitical
analysis in terms of the likelihood of this influencing and/or
compromising
available empirical evidence that otherwise would confirm an ET
presence.
Therefore, exopolitical analysis has some key differences from more
conventional approaches to political analysis which are based on a
traditional social scientific method of a value free, objective
analysis of
available processes, institutions and actors in the public policy
arena.

What follows is an exopolitical analysis of the policy dimensions of
an
historic ET presence that is pertinent to Iraq and a US led preemptive
attack on the regime of Saddam Hussein. In conducting this analysis, I
will
first examine the available evidence of an historical ET presence in
Iraq;
then apply this evidence to better understand the contemporary
political
situation in Iraq; I will then analyze the motivations of the main
political
actors in the prospective US led preemptive war against Iraq; and
finally
conclude by making some policy recommendations.
What's the Evidence for an historic ET presence in Iraq?

The strongest available evidence for an historical ET presence in Iraq
comes
from cuneiform tablets directly recording the beliefs and activities
of the
ancient Sumerians whose civilization began almost overnight in 3800
BC. Most
of these cuneiform tablets relate stories of the Sumerians interacting
with
their 'gods'. Most archeologists initially accepted that these were
merely
myths and attached little importance to them other than giving insight
into
the mytho-religious beliefs of the ancient Sumerians. That viewpoint
received a major challenge in 1976 when the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia
Sitchin, published the first of a series of books on his translations
of
thousands of Sumerian tablets. (7) Rather than treating the stories of
the
gods as myths that had little empirical relevance, Sitchin interpreted
the
tablets as literal descriptions of events as they occurred in the
time.

Sitchin's translations of Sumerian cuneiform tablets revealed precise
information on a range of topics that he argues could not have been
possible
for a civilization at the initial stages of its development with no
obvious
predecessor civilization to borrow from. According to Sitchin, the
Sumerians
had detailed knowledge of all the planets in the solar system,
understood
the precession of the equinoxes, and also had an understanding of
complex
medical procedures. (8) As to where they could have gained this
detailed
knowledge, Sitchin's translations suggest that the Sumerians provided
a
clear answer for its ultimate source. They revealed in their tablets
that
all their knowledge came from a race of extraterrestrial visitors the
'Anunnaki' ('those who from heaven to Earth came') who were not only
teachers for the Sumerians, but also played a role in the creation of
the
human race. The origin of this ET race was a planet called Nibiru that
had a
long elliptical journey around the sun, and returned to this region of
the
solar system every 3,600 years. (9)

When Sitchin's innovative work was first published, it raised great
controversy and intense debate between those either for or against his
main
thesis of an historic ET presence in Sumer that was responsible for
starting
the remarkable Sumerian civilization. Among those responding favorably
to
Sitchin's thesis included established popular authors such as Erik Von
Danniken who had himself written in 1969, the best selling book,
Chariots of
the Gods, that proposed an historic ET presence in different parts of
the
planet. (10) Another popular author, David Hatcher Childress, outlines
with
great detail the ET technology possessed by ancient civilizations in
his
various books. (11) Less well known authors such as William Henry have
similarly published books supporting Sitchin's thesis. (12)

To support Sitchin's thesis, many authors typically cite biblical
texts that
make reference to the 'gods' that resided on Earth and interacted with
humanity. The biblical text most referred to is the apocryphal book of
Enoch. (13) While the Book of Enoch was excluded in most versions of
the Old
Testament, it was nevertheless part of ancient Hebrew scholarship and
indeed
is included in the Ethiopian and Slavic versions of the Old Testament.
The
Book of Enoch describes a rebel group of angels, the 'Nephilim', who
numbered 200, who settled the Earth and interbred with the human
population
before being recalled and punished by their superiors, the 'Elohim'.
(14)
The Book of Enoch provides contextual detail for mysterious verses in
the
Book of Genesis which describes a time when the 'sons of gods', the
Nephilim/Anunnaki, interbred with humanity, and created a race of
giants/heroes that ruled over the rest of humanity: "The Nephilim were
on
the earth in those days-and also afterwards-when the sons of God went
to the
daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of
old, men
of renown." (15) Supporters of the Sitchin thesis say that this is
part of
the biblical evidence that an advanced ET race did in fact exist on
Earth,
had a long interaction with humanity, and even played a role in the
creation
of the human race.
In addition to the growing number of authors, independent
archaeologists and
biblical commentators supporting Sitchin's thesis, there are a
burgeoning
number of individuals who claim to be in telepathic communication with
ET
races who reveal information on the historic ET presence in Sumer. One
of
these ET 'channels', is Jelaila Starr who claims to be in touch with
beings
from Nibiru itself, and she regularly releases online information from
the
Anunnaki themselves on her website. (16) Another is Sheldan Nidle who
'channels' an ET race from the star system Sirius gives extensive
information on the historic presence and influence of the Anunnaki in
his
books and website. (17)

There is great controversy over the extent to which such a disparate
collection of evidentiary sources can substantiate the Sitchin thesis
of an
historic ET presence in Sumer. Despite the controversy generated by
such
sources, they provide a wealth of information that merits closer
examination
in terms of their public policy implications. Given that exopolitics
is
based on the premise of an ET presence that is subject to
non-disclosure by
clandestine government organizations, it is possible to provide an
exopolitical perspective on Sitchin's thesis despite the ongoing
debate over
the consistency and accuracy of the available evidence.

How Does the Historic ET presence relate to US policy in Iraq?

An independent archaeologist that discusses a direct link between the
ancient ET presence in Sumer (southern Iraq) and current US focus on
the
regime of Saddam Hussein, is William Henry. Henry's main thesis is
that
there existed in Sumerian times a technological device which he
describes as
a 'Stargate', that the Anunnaki/Nephilim used to travel back and forth
from
their homeworld and the Earth, and also how they travel around the
galaxy.
(18) Henry focuses on the following scene described by Sitchin's
interpretation of a cuneiform tablet of an Uruk ritual text:
Depictions have been found that show divine beings flanking a temple
entrance and holding up poles to which ringlike objects are attached.
The
celestial nature of the scene is indicated by the inclusion of the
symbols
of the Sun and the Moon.... depicting Enlil and Enki flanking a
gateway
through which Anu is making a grand entrance. (19)

Rather than a simple temple scene involving the chief Anunnaki of the
Sumerians, Anu and his two sons, Enlil and Enki, Henry proposes that
the
above scene represents a transportation device used by Anu and others
from
the elite Anunnaki. If so, then such a device is most likely located
in the
Sumerian city of Uruk which was the founding city of the Sumerian
civilization and the home of Gilgamesh, the famed king of the Epic of
Gilgamesh. (20)
Sitchin, and authors such as David Childress who discuss the various
technologies used by ETs and ancient civilizations, missed the
significance
of the Stargate in their own translations of the above texts and
investigations of ET transportation. Both operated in a conventional
paradigm where transportation occurs through rocket propelled
vehicles. (21)
Sitchin focuses on rocket propelled spacecraft in his description of
the
Anunnaki and their various trips to and from the Earth. For example,
describing the transportation used by the Anunnaki in moving between
their
earth and space based locations, Sitchin wrote: "The texts reveal that
three
hundred of them - The "Anunnaki of Heaven," or Igig- were true
astronauts
who stayed aboard the spacecraft without actually landing on Earth.
Orbiting
Earth, these spacecraft launched and received the shuttle craft to and
from
Earth." (22)
It therefore can be concluded that there were two forms of
transportation
used by the Anunnaki. One was a form of rocket technology familiar to
us
which was used by the resident Anunnaki on Earth who Sitchin,
described as
the "rank and file Anunnaki" who administered the Earth and humanity
according to the dictates of their space based compatriots. (23)
Another
transportation technology was the Stargate which presumably was used
only by
the highest class of Anunnaki, who dispensed the tasks of harvesting
the
Earth's resources to the resident and space based Anunnaki (lessor
gods/rebel angels). Interpreting the Babylonian Epic of Creation, one
gains
an idea of the way tasks were allotted and the hierarchy of the
Anunnaki in
the way the 'supreme god' Marduk, dispensed tasks to his subordinate
Anu,
chief of the Anunnaki:

Assigned to Anu, to heed his instructions, Three hundred in the
heavens he
stationed as a guard; the ways of Earth to define from the Heaven; And
on
Earth, Six hundred he made reside. After he all their instructions had
ordered, to the Anunnaki of Heaven and of Earth he allotted their
assignments. (24)
Thus the Anunnaki operated outposts both on Earth and in Space to
maintain
their control over the planet. Given the strict hierarchy of authority
described by Sitchin in his detailed analysis of the Anunnaki and
their
interactions with one another and humanity, it is likely that the
Stargate
would have been revered and a subject of awe by the resident Anunnaki
and
humanity who could only observe its operation but were not allowed to
use it
themselves. As such, there would have been only a limited number of
Stargates around the planet, with the Sumerian Stargate being located
in the
most important of the ancient Sumerian cities - the most likely being
the
ancient capital of Uruk, home of the ancient kings, which is located
in
Southern Iraq. Significantly, after a 12 year lull in excavations, a
team of
German researchers in 2002 resumed excavations in the buried city of
Uruk.
Using a magnetometer which is able to detect the presence of man-made
objects beneath the soil, and a powerful computer system in Germany,
German
geophysicists were able to map out the buried structures of the
sprawling
ancient capital of 5.5 km2 that was where Sumerian civilization began.
(25)

An important event in the Sumerian descriptions of the Anunnaki, was
the
latter's final departure from the planet during a series of
cataclysmic
events that culminated in the period 1800-1700 BC. (26) Indeed,
conventional
archeologists support the view that there was a regional cataclysmic
event
that occurred at that time. (27) If in fact there were two modes of
transportation used by the Anunnaki, when most of the resident/lessor
Anunnaki left by conventional rocket ships, elite Anunnaki most likely
left
by the Stargate and closed it down. Predictably, given the reverence
and awe
surrounding the Stargate, it would not have been left unprotected in
the
interim period between their departure and its reactivation with the
prophesied return of the Anunnaki.

A wide number of sources describe the present era in terms of a
'prophesied
return of the gods/Anunnaki'. The notion of a 'prophesied return' in
the
context of the former Anunnaki presence varies in meaning according to
three
different perspectives. The first perspective is based simply on the
idea of
the gods or 'Anunnaki' physically returning to resume a prominent role
in
influencing human affairs and overseeing the use of resources of the
planet.
(28) In such a scenario, the first wave of Anunnaki would arrive to
create
the favorable conditions for the anticipated return of the Anunnaki
elite.
This would involve the lessor Anunnaki first returning and activating
the
Sumerian Stargate that would be required for the return of their
leaders.
Presumably, this would be heralded as a sacred event that should be
celebrated by all humanity. The authors, Clive Prince and Lyn
Picknett,
argue that there has been an identifiable chain of global events
involving
key religious and political actors preparing humanity for just such a
return. (29)

The second perspective on the "return of the gods/Anunnaki' is the
return of
their home world, the planet Nibiru. Indeed, there has been much
interest
generated by a range of books and online web sites devoted to the
topic of
the return of Nibiru, the home world of the Anunnaki. Many authors
cite a
variety of astronomical evidence supporting the idea of a tenth planet
that
has long been speculated to influence the orbits of Uranus and Neptune
ever
since it was found that Pluto (discovered in 1930) could not account
for
these perturbations. In the late1970's two astronomers from the US
Naval
Observatory, Tom van Flandern and Richard Harrington, begun publishing
a
series of papers supporting the existence of a tenth planet. (30)

The most widely cited reference to support the thesis of a tenth
planet that
is known but not released to the general public, is a series of press
releases by the astronomical team that were searching a part of the
sky
which calculations by van Flandern and Harrington suggested would be
where
the tenth planet was. In December 1983, the chief astronomer in charge
of
the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) run by the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Dr Gerry Neugebauer, announced possible confirmation of
such a
planet. The Washington Post Reporter summarizing the announcement
wrote:
"[a] heavenly body possibly as large as ... Jupiter and possibly ...
part of
this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation
of
Orion by an orbiting telescope..." (31) After a total of six major
newspapers covered the announcement, there was a retraction of the
announcement and public silence by astronomers on the possible
existence of
a tenth planet. Rumors began to emerge of an active campaign of
suppression
of information and intimidation by clandestine government
organizations.
(32) For example, one of the astronomers at the US Naval Observatory,
Dr
Richard Harrington, spoke publically and wrote articles on the
hypothetical
planet X and there has been speculation that this directly contributed
to
his untimely death by 'natural causes' in 1992. (33)

A third perspective on what the 'prophesied return of the
gods/Anunnaki'
means can be found in authors who focus on the significance of the
upcoming
end of the current Mayan 5,200 year cycle. According to John Major
Jenkins,
the Mayans were aware of the way the solar ecliptic plane comes into
alignment with the galactic plane on periodic basis. This makes it
possible
for more intense cosmic energies to reach the earth from the galactic
core.
There is then a corresponding increase or decrease in the level of
human
consciousness, i.e., parts of the brain either go online or off-line,
as
these Mayan cycles go through their different phases. According to
Jenkins,
the year 2012 corresponds to the end of the current Mayan cycle and
will
lead to a rapid transformation of global consciousness. (34) Numerous
authors refer to this as a New Age of more enlightened global thinking
and
increased human potential. (35) The 'prophesied return of the gods'
may
therefore signify a rapid in human consciousness as dormant parts of
the
brain come on line when the solar ecliptic comes into alignment with
the
galactic plane. In this explanation, humanity itself would develop
'god-like' powers which spontaneously become accessible to large
numbers of
humanity. A number of authors, for example, have been describing the
amazing
abilities and psychic powers of an increasing number of children world
wide.
(36)

In sum, the available information on the 'prophesied return of the
gods' can
be understood to signify an important milestone in the growth of human
civilization. The 'prophesied return' can be interpreted either
literally or
metaphorically to mean either a physical return of the
'gods'/Anunnaki; the
return of a mysterious 10th planet to the solar system; or a rapid
growth in
the consciousness of humanity as the solar plane comes into alignment
with
the galactic plane. Despite the controversy over what precisely such a
'prophesied return' signifies, the factors in such a return that most
pertain to the current political situation in Iraq and preemptive
military
intervention by the US can be identified and analyzed. The first
factor is
that an ET transportation device, a Stargate, or some other important
ET
artifact, may lie buried in the desert of Southern Iraq which
presumably
will play a role in the 'prophesied return of the gods'. Second, it is
possible that there will be a return of a tenth planet that plays a
critical
role in return of the Anunnaki and/or which significantly impacts on
the
global environment. Finally, there is the potential for a rapid
acceleration
of human consciousness as the end of the Mayan Calendar, 2012,
approaches.

Exopolitical Analysis of US policy towards Iraq

If there is a Stargate existing in Southern Iraq that will play a role
in
such a 'prophesied return of the gods', then it is most likely that
clandestine government organizations that greatly influence or control
the
Bush administration, are aware of the existence and the role of this
Stargate. Iraq's President Hussein is most likely also aware of such a
Stargate's existence as might be inferred by his architectural
projects
intent on reviving the grandeur of early Mesopotamian civilizations,
and
cementing his place as the restorer of Iraq's past glory. (37) More
significantly, his permission for a German team of archaeologists to
resume
excavations in the Sumerian city of Uruk after detailed underground
mapping,
suggests that this may be the location of the Sumerian Stargate. This
knowledge of a buried Stargate, may also be part of the reason why the
German government has been publically opposed to a US preemptive war
against
Iraq. If in fact both the Hussein regime and the Bush administration
believe
that a Stargate lies buried in the sands of Southern Iraq, then there
most
likely exists a race to gain access to it and to control it. William
Henry's
thesis is that this is indeed the political underpinning of the
continuing
military conflict in Iraq. (38)

>From the perspective of the Bush administration, control of the
Sumerian
Stargate would enable clandestine government organizations to continue
their
global campaign of non-disclosure of the ET presence. (39) This is
strongly
implied by the Bush administration's penchant for secrecy and
overturning
many of the Freedom of Information initiatives from the earlier
Clinton
administration. Control of the Stargate, in addition to any other
Stargates
that may have been established in the capitals of other civilizations,
e.g.,
the Egyptian, Incan and Aztec; would presumably give clandestine
government
organizations greater leverage with ET races that are presently
interacting
with the planet, or are predicted to arrive on the scene in some event
associated with the 'prophesied return of the gods'. At the very
least,
control of the Sumerian Stargate would allow clandestine government
organizations to dictate the pace of global transformations that ET
races
promise to introduce to the Earth with their advanced technology,
superior
knowledge and heightened psychic abilities.

On the part of Hussein Regime, control of the Stargate would allow him
to
activate it and to fulfill prophesy by facilitating the return of an
advanced race of ETs, the elite Anunnaki. President Hussein probably
imagines that in return for his loyalty to the elite Anunnaki, he
would be
rewarded with a position of great global authority. Perhaps he would
even
see himself as some kind of human savior facilitating the return of
the gods
who would solve all of humanity's problem, and end the rule of
clandestine
government organizations perpetuating non-disclosure of the ET
presence.
Significantly, European governments such as Germany, and perhaps even
France
and Russia, may be giving themselves greater leverage in the future
control
of the Stargate by offering diplomatic cover for the Hussein regime as
a
quid pro quo for allowing the resumption of archaeological digging in
Uruk.
These governments and the clandestine organizations associated with
them
that have access to knowledge over the ET presence, most likely have
deep
suspicion over the willingness of the US to share information and
control
over the future of the Sumerian Stargate and any other ET technology
discovered in Iraq.

Sitchin's thesis of an ancient ET presence in Sumer combined with the
notion
of a variety of ET transportation devices described by other authors
in
their research of ancient civilizations, and resumption of
archaeological
excavations of the first Sumerian capital Uruk in 2002, give support
to
William Henry's thesis of a Stargate that lies buried in the sands of
southern Iraq. This provides important contextual information that is
helpful in understanding the true motivations of the Bush
administration in
launching a preemptive attack on Iraq.

It may be argued that the Bush administration and the Hussein Regime
are
both in a race against time to gain access and control of the Stargate
in
the ruins of Uruk or some other location in Iraq, before the
prophesied
return of the Anunnaki. At the moment, a stalemate exists. Hussein
controls
the ground in Southern Iraq, and is permitting the German led
excavations in
Uruk, while the US led coalition controls the sky and is monitoring
the
situation. The Bush administration wants control of Iraq territory to
take
control of excavations of Uruk to uncover its buried Stargate, and
closely
monitor and control it. In contrast, Hussein wants to find and
activate the
Stargate for his greater glory and presumably the benefit of humanity.

The primary evidentiary support for the above discussion is admittedly
thin
for conventional public policy experts and may sound better suited to
a
fictional thriller than serious public debate. From a conventional
perspective, a scattered assortment of independent archeological
authors,
radical exegetical interpretations of biblical texts, the writings of
'channels' of ET knowledge, speculative papers from astronomers hardly
constitute a persuasive source of information for understanding the
motivations of US foreign policy. The prevailing explanations of a
Bush
administration as either devoted to eradicating Weapons of Mass
Destruction,
and/or being driven by oil interests and imperial ambitions would
predictably prevail for those unconvinced by the above sources.

There is however some important circumstantial evidence which lends
plausibility to the Henry thesis of a Stargate as the true focus of
the Bush
administration or at least key interest groups behind it. The first
piece of
circumstantial evidence, are the overwhelming whistleblower
testimonies
confirming the existence of clandestine government organizations
responsible
for suppressing public knowledge of an ET presence, and which controls
all
official interaction with ET races. (40) From an exopolitical
perspective,
then, the clandestine suppression of a contemporary ET presence,
supports
the conclusion that there is also an active clandestine suppression of
an
ancient ET presence which also has significant public policy
implications.

The second piece of circumstantial evidence, is the powerful
diplomatic
support given by Germany and France to the Hussein Regime in warding
off a
preemptive military strike. So powerful has been this support, that
the US
Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, disparagingly referred to them
as the
"Old Europe" in response to a reporter on January 22, 2003:

"You're thinking of Europe as Germany and France. I don't. I think
that's
'old Europe.' If you look at the entire NATO Europe today, the center
of
gravity is shifting to the East. And there are a lot of new members.
And if
you just take the list of all the members of NATO and all of those who
have
been invited in recently -- what is it, 26, something like that? [But]
you're right. Germany has been a problem, and France has been a
problem."
(41)

Rather than backtracking on what was a diplomatic bombshell, the Bush
administration has instead continued to go to extraordinary lengths to
isolate the German and French positions on Iraq. For example, the
administration encouraged the leaders of Spain, Portugal, Italy, the
United
Kingdom, Hungary, Poland, Denmark and the Czech Republic, to write a
letter
to the Wall Street Journal on January 30 that said ``the Iraqi regime
and
its weapons of mass destruction represent a clear threat to world
security.'' (42) Rather than merely an intense diplomatic debate over
different policy positions on Iraq, the striking language and
positions
taken in this debate suggests a more fundamental conflict over issues
hidden
from the public view. It is likely that there exists a factional
struggle
between clandestine government organizations set up to deal with the
ET
presence in the US, with rival organizations created in Germany,
France and
also Russia.

The third piece of circumstantial evidence is the resumption of
excavations
of the first capital of Sumer, Uruk, by a German archeological team in
2002.
Given the prominence of Uruk and its likelihood as the site for a
Sumerian
Stargate, then resumption of excavations raises questions over why
they were
resumed at this time and what is being sought. Given that political
tensions
in Iraq had not significantly diminished in 2002 with it being a
likely
source of future military conflict with the US, it can be suggested
that
there are powerful hidden motivations for what on the surface appears
to be
a purely scientific dig of an ancient Sumerian capital.

The fourth piece of circumstantial evidence was the destruction of the
Space
Shuttle Columbia during its final descent on February 1, 2003, at an
approximate height of 38 miles and travelling at Mach 18. One of the
astronauts was the first Israeli in Space, Colonel IIan Ramon from the
Israeli Airforce. Col Ramon reportedly played a role in the Israeli
attack
on Iraq's nuclear facility in Osirak in June 1981, and there has been
speculation that his mission involved intelligence gathering over Iraq
during the Shuttle's orbits. The destruction of Columbia occurred 16
minutes
before touch down when its fuel tanks would have been virtually empty.
A
likely source of the Shuttle's destruction, given the speed and height
of
the Columbia, would have been some form of attack from an organization
or
state possessing military capabilities well beyond any terrorist
groups and
indeed most nations. The likely cause would have been a clandestine
government organization that desired to send an important message to
its US
rivals over the threatened preemptive attack on Iraq.

When all the primary and circumstantial evidence is put together, what
emerges is a very plausible case that supports Henry's thesis of a
power
struggle that goes to the heart of the ET presence and the continued
clandestine suppression of ET related information and its full
implications.
The interpretations of the motivations of the Bush administration in
launching preemptive war on Iraq in terms of the concerns raised in
Bush's
2003 State of the Union address, or the corporate and imperial
interests
suggested by his critics such as Robert Fisk and Michael Lind, can all
be
described as part of the surface layer of motivations driving the Bush
administration. At a deeper level, it is likely that there is great
anxiety
by clandestine government organizations in terms of what would happen
if
Hussein, with the support of the German and other European
governments,
gained access to the Sumerian Stargate or other ET technology buried
in
Uruk, or if the Stargate were to somehow reactivate without
clandestine
government personnel present to monitor and control the Stargate.
President
Bush's State of the Union address outlining the need for a preemptive
attack
on Iraq, in most likelihood masks a hidden agenda to gain access to
the
Stargate or other ET technology in Uruk and elsewhere in Iraq. Such
access
would presumably perpetuate clandestine government control over global
resources and information at a time of increased ET activity and
influence.

Conclusion: Policy Implications and Recommendations

If the exopolitical perspective is a more accurate description of the
motivations driving the Bush administration in pushing for a
preemptive war
on Iraq, then the following policy recommendations can be made. (43)
First,
the quality of evidence substantiating an historic ET presence and
clandestine government cover up has a significant degree of
credibility and
persuasiveness. This supports the creation a new field of public
policy,
exopolitics, which would study the historic ET presence in terms of
its
implications for contemporary public policy.

Second, there is a need to promote official government disclosure of
the
historic ET presence and/or the impending return of these ETs; and to
make
more representative the policy making process that has evolved in
government
responses to such information.

Third, evidence suggests that the present military preparations for a
war
against Iraq have little to do with weapons of mass destruction, but
are
designed to perpetuate US clandestine government control of
information
concerning the historic and present ET presence. Such a preemptive war
should therefore be stopped and a resolution between the US, Iraq and
interested European governments should be encouraged.

Fourth, evidence suggests that the Iraq conflict and the destruction
of the
Columbia Space Shuttle mask a deep factional struggle between
clandestine
government organizations associated with different national
governments that
were initially created to deal with the ET presence. It is recommended
that
there is public disclosure of these organizations and their efforts in
monitoring and responding to the ET presence, and that these
organizations
become accountable to elected public officials.

The final policy recommendation is that there needs to be more effort
in
determining the extent to which congressional and legislative
oversight is
required for organizations created in different countries to deal with
all
aspects of the ET presence, both past and present, and on the
implications
of a projected return of a race of ETs associated with the birth of
human
civilization.

This paper suggests that the best mechanism for responding to the
existence
of ancient ET technology in the ancient Sumerian capital of Uruk
and/or
elsewhere, is a willingness by major world governments and associated
clandestine organizations to share information and control over these
ET
assets. A preemptive war conducted largely for the control of a
'Stargate'
in Uruk which pits the US and its allies, against an Iraq which is
tacitly
supported by key European nations, could be calamitous if indeed the
'prophesied return' signified an actual physical event involving the
ancient
ET race that played a role in the start of human civilization.
Competing
clandestine government organizations struggling through a proxy war
over the
control of ancient ET technology in order to prepare for those events
corresponding to the 'prophesied return of the gods', would hardly
send the
best example of a mature humanity responsible enough to continue to
exercise
sovereignty over the Earth's resources. The Columbia Space Shuttle may
well
have been a high profile victim of such a proxy war intended to send a
message to US based clandestine organizations over the preemptive war
against Iraq. .Human sovereignty may therefore be at stake at the very
time
where there exists an opportunity for a rapid movement forward in the
evolutionary growth of human consciousness. It is up to all humanity
to
decide how we respond to the challenge posed by clandestine
organizations
struggling over Iraq's historic resources to further their respective
secret
agendas.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
----

ENDNOTES

I would like to thank my good friend Yazdi Kaleghi for his insights on
the
Columbia Space Shuttle tragedy and the contents of this Study.
1. For the full text of his January 28, 2003, State of the Union
Address, go
to http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html

2. Robert Fisk, "This looming war isn't about chemical warheads or
human
rights: it's about oil," The Independent 18 January, 2003.
http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=370328

3. See Michael Lind, Made In Texas: George W. Bush and the Southern
Takeover
of American Politics (Basic Books, 2002)

4. For an introduction to exopolitics, see Michael Salla, "The Need
for
Exopolitics: Implications of Extraterrestrial Conspiracy Theories for
Policy
Makers and Global Peace," www.exopolitics.org, January 20, 2003.

5. For more discussion on Exopolitics see, Michael Salla, "The Need
for
Exopolitics" www.exopolitics.org

6. 100 of this officials have already given testimony, with another
300
willing to do so. See Stephen Greer, Executive Summary of the
Disclosure
Project (Crozet, VA.: Disclosure Project, April 2001). Website:
www.disclosureproject.com

7. Zecharia Sitchin, The Earth Chronicles, Books 1-6 (New York: Avon
Books)

8. See his chapter, "The Sudden Civilization," The 12th Planet: Book 1
of
the Earth Chronicles(Avon Books, 1976) 12-51.

9. Sitchin discusses this planet in, The 12th Planet: Book 1of the
Earth
Chronicles (Avon, 1976).

10. Erich von Daniken, Chariots of the Gods (New York: G.P. Putnam's
Sons,
1969).

11. David Hatcher Childress, Technology of the Gods: The Incredible
Sciences
of the Ancients, (Adventures Unlimited Press, 2000).

12. William Henry, One Foot in Atlantis. (Earthpulse Press, 1998).

13. An online version of the Book of Enoch can be found at
http://wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/ot/pseudo/enoch.htm

14. Sitchin describes the Sumerian version of this event in "Mutiny of
the
Anunnaki," The 12th Planet, 312-335.

15. Holy Bible: New International Version (Hodder and Stoughton, 1978)
Genesis, Book 6, verse 4.

16. Jelaila Starr, We Are the Nibiruans: Return of the 12th Planet
(New Leaf
Distributing Co., 1999). Website: http://www.nibiruancouncil.com/

17. Sheldan Nidle, First Contact (Vancouver: Blue Lodge Press, 2000).
Website: www.paoweb.com

18. Henry outlines his thesis in his article, "Saddam Hussein, The
Stairway
to Heaven and the Return of Planet X" which is available on his
website
www.williamhenry.net . This is based on his book Ark of the Christos:
The
Mythology, Symbolism and Prophecy of the Return of Planet X and the
Age of
Terror, both of which are available from his website:
www.williamhenry.net

19. Sitchin, When Time Began: Book V of the Earth Chronicles (Avon,
1993)
113-14.

20. In contrast Henry believes that the Stargate was buried in some
secret
location by the Bablyonian king, Nebuchadnezzar, after having been
re-taken
from Jerusalem. Saddam Hussein, The Stairway to Heaven and the Return
of
Planet X" which is available on his website www.williamhenry.net

21. Sitchin describes the transportation of the Nefilim/Anunnakin, in
his
chapter, "The Nefilim: People of the Fiery Rockets," The 12th Planet,
128-72. See also Childress' chapter on "Ancient Flight and Aerial
Warfare,"
Extraterrestrial Archeology, 147-210.

22. Sitchin, The 12th Planet, 327

23. Sitchin, The 12th Planet, 327

24. Sitchin, The 12th Planet, 327

25. For description of the resumption of archeological digs in Iraq,
see
Charles Recknagel, "Iraq: Archaeological Expedition Mapping Ancient
City Of
Uruk," Radio Free Europe, May 3.
http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2002/05/03052002101632.asp

26. Sitchin describes these events in the third volume of his Earth
Chronicles series, The Wars of Gods and Men (Avon, 1999)

27. For reference to this regional disaster, see an article by the
Chief
Archeologist from the University of Chicago, Prof McGuire Gibson,
"Nippur -
Sacred City of Enlil Supreme God of Sumer and Akkad." First published
in
Al-Rafidan, Vol. XIV (1993 ) and made available online at at
http://asmar.uchicago.edu/OI/PROJ/NIP/PUB93/NSC/NSC.html

28. Such a view is described by a number of 'channels' including
Sheldan
Nidle, First Contact; and Jelaila Star, We are the Niburuans. Their
respective websites are www.paoweb.net and www.niburuancouncil.net

29. Lynn Picknett & Clive Prince, The Stargate Conspiracy: The Truth
About
Extraterrestrial Life and the Mysteries of Ancient Egypt (Berkley
Books,
1999)

30. For the history of astronomical searches for Planet X, see William
Graves Hoyt: Planet X and Pluto, (The University of Arizona Press
1980),
Mark Littman: Planets Beyond - discovering the outer solar system,
(John
Wiley 1988); and Tom van Flandern, Dark Matter, Missing Planets & New
Comets. Paradoxes resolved, origins illuminated (North Atlantic Books
1993).

31. Thomas O'Toole, "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered: Possibly as
Large as
Jupiter," Washington Post (December 31, 1983).

32. See Mark Hazlewood, Blindsided: Planet X Passes in 2003,
(Firstpublish
LLC, 2001). Hazlewood maintains a website with online excepts
outlining
clandestine goverment suppression of the coming of Planet X,
http://www.planetx2003.com/index.html

33. See Hazlewood, Blindsided: Planet X Passes in 2003. Website:
http://www.planetx2003.com/index.html

34. Jenkins is author of Maya Cosmogenesis 2012 (Santa Fe: Bear and
Co.,
1998); and Galactic Alignment: The Transformation of Consciousness
According
to Mayan, Egyptian, and Vedic Traditions (Inner Traditions
International,
2002).

35. One of the first to identify this upcoming transition was Jose
Arguelles
and Brian Swimme, The Mayan Factor: Path Beyond Technology (Bear and
Co.,
1987)

36. See Lee Carroll and Jan Tober, The Indigo Children: The New Kids
Have
Arrived (Hay House, 1999); and Drunvalo Melchizidek, The Ancient
Secret of
the Flower of Life (Light Technology Publications, 2000) Vol 2,
443-54.

37. Henry discusses these projects in Ark of the Christos.

38. Henry outlines this in his article, "Saddam Hussein, The Stairway
to
Heaven and the Return of Planet X" which is available on his website
www.williamhenry.net .

39. For more discussion of this non-disclosure, see M. Salla, "The
Need for
Exopolitics."

40. See Salla, "The Need for Exopolitics."

41. For discussion of Rumsfeld's comments and the French/German
response,
see Mark Baker, "Rumsfeld's 'Old' And 'New' Europe Touches On Uneasy
Divide," Radio Free Europe, 24 January, 2003. Website:
http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2003/01/24012003172118.asp

42. Wall Street Journal. Jan 30, 2003.

43. See Salla, "The Need for Exopolitics."



--[YONSATU - ITB]----------------------------------------------------------
Online archive : <http://yonsatu.mahawarman.net>
Moderators     : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe    : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vacation       : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Kirim email ke