* Jim Bublitz (Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:13:51 -0800)
I've never minded people using my software for free - even
commercially. I just hate it when they whine about software being
free, but not on terms where they can profit enormously from other
people's work. It's the whining, not the profiting,
On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, Knapp wrote:
Why do we live?
not for searching the pyqt archives :-)
--
Wolfgang
___
PyQt mailing listPyQt@riverbankcomputing.com
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/mailman/listinfo/pyqt
On 2009-02-10 15:10, Knapp wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Andreas Pakulatap...@gmx.de wrote:
On 10.02.09 19:56:44, Knapp wrote:
I see that the newer QT4.5 has the LGPL license. Does this mean that
pyQT will also have this license? Does using this license mean that
you can use the lib
On Tuesday 10 February 2009 13:30:24 pm Robert Kern wrote:
pyKDE is ??? LGPL???
No, PyKDE is GPL.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pykde
PyKDE4 is LGPL (per KDE request, more or less). The docs are (were?)
Creative Commons.
I'm not sure what PyKDE3 is - it's basically whatever I want it
