From: Sebastian Elsner
To: pyqt@riverbankcomputing.com
Date: Tuesday 28 September 2010
> Hmm interesting topic, I recently had to switch back from ui files to
> py files because I couldnt get py2exe to package the ui files correctly
> (Any help appreciated though)
The same thing happened to me
> Hmm interesting topic, I recently had to switch back from ui files to
> py files because I couldnt get py2exe to package the ui files correctly
> (Any help appreciated though)
I usually use both of them to deal with this problem.
My python code which depends on ui files (ie. class which herit
Hi All
Thanks for the replies, it's food for thought. I will be packaging my code
with py2exe. If there's a snag in packaging them correctly then perhaps it's
best for me to compile the ui. Unless of course someone has an idea as to
what could be Sebastian's problem. Loading the ui file does seem
Hmm interesting topic, I recently had to switch back from ui files to
py files because I couldnt get py2exe to package the ui files correctly
(Any help appreciated though)
Secondly using ui files I loose the comfort of auto-completion with
pydev and Eclipse, because pydev wouldnt know how to de
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:19 PM, pard wrote:
> Hi
> I have found that some people use pyuic4 to compile their ui files and some
> load them dynamically using loadUI.
> Does anyone have the pro's and con's of each of these methods? What is the
> recommended PyQT way of doing this?
Thanks for start
On Tuesday 28 September 2010, 18:19:43 pard wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have found that some people use pyuic4 to compile their ui files and
> some load them dynamically using loadUI.
> Does anyone have the pro's and con's of each of these methods? What is
> the recommended PyQT way of doing
> this?
Being i
On 9/28/2010 1:19 PM, Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote:
On Dienstag 28 September 2010, Sebastian Wiesner wrote:
So basically it "just works", whereas pyuic4 means additional
work. UI compilers are fine for C++, where you have to
compile anyway, but in Python things are easier. Just my
opinion ...
+1
On Dienstag 28 September 2010, Sebastian Wiesner wrote:
> So basically it "just works", whereas pyuic4 means additional
> work. UI compilers are fine for C++, where you have to
> compile anyway, but in Python things are easier. Just my
> opinion ...
+1
however I never tested how much time eithe
Hi,
I prefer uic.loadUi, it's simply much more convenient and much easier to use.
It saves the tedious invocation of pyuic4 during development. And no
risk of weird errors caused by a forgotten compilation of your user
interface ... the application automatically uses the user interface,
that you
Hi
I have found that some people use pyuic4 to compile their ui files and some
load them dynamically using loadUI.
Does anyone have the pro's and con's of each of these methods? What is the
recommended PyQT way of doing
this?
Regards
Pard
___
PyQt maili
10 matches
Mail list logo
