Hi Phil, > Class.forName is sufficient since the GE is part of the > implementation, not an end-user definable interface.
Sure, that is clear. > So long as that is clear, I can't think of any problem the proposed > change would cause the JDK. Good. I filed a bug in bugzilla to track this: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100052 I also found a very old bug in Sun's DB: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4385680 Would be nice to see this go into OpenJDK7. /Roman -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Roman Kennke, Software Engineer, http://kennke.org aicas Allerton Interworks Computer Automated Systems GmbH Haid-und-Neu-Straße 18 * D-76131 Karlsruhe * Germany http://www.aicas.com * Tel: +49-721-663 968-48 USt-Id: DE216375633, Handelsregister HRB 109481, AG Karlsruhe Geschäftsführer: Dr. James J. Hunt
