Hi Mario,
That's just what I was trying to describe, thanks! Looks good to go...
...jim
Mario Torre wrote:
Il 25/09/2009 22:29, Jim Graham ha scritto:
Hi Jim,
I think we could add a quick "if (loops == null) {...}" in those 2
classes and maybe add a comment "// assert(some pipe will always be a
LoopBasedPipe)" to indicate that we aren't checking the types of the
pipes because we think it is always true in case that assumption changes
in the future. Does that make sense?
Not sure if this is what you mean:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~neugens/100068/webrev.09
Looks like it doesn't break stuff, I did the usual test with Java2D demo.
Cheers,
Mario
