> Looks good except for a typo in a comment on computeIntersection(). > You > have duplicated the entire phrase "in m[off] ... in m[off] ..." twice. > > I don't need to see a webrev of fixing the comment. It looks good to > go...
I pushed it. Thanks for the review (and pointing out the performance improvement, and the bug itself... :) Regards, Denis. ----- Original Message ----- > Hi Denis, > > > ...jim > > On 4/27/2011 7:57 AM, Denis Lila wrote: > >> Why don't you back them out and put up a webrev so I can proof it > >> before > >> you push. I'll get to it today... ...
