On 6/24/2011 2:23 PM, Denis Lila wrote:
As a matter of book keeping I notice that 7049339 was recently closed
as a duplicate of 6775390.
So really this should have been pushed under 6775390 which I think had
the better explanation too as well as being the original report.
Sorry about that. I checked 7049339 before pushing, and it hadn't been
closed yet.
It was closed on 3rd June but you are right that for some reason
bugs.sun.com
is still showing it as accepted. I thought that was cured by now. In
any case
I wasn't really expecting you'd have noticed all this, just pointing
out a few
things for the record
It also had a ready made test case that probably could have been used.
And I verified your fix fixes that test case.
I see there was also a fix posted for it, nearly identical to mine.
Why wasn't that commited?
A very reasonable question and I can only suppose that it was filed as a
P4 (low priority)
bug,. the submitter never followed up on the email list, and the Resp.
Eng. never got around
to reviewing it.
-phil.
But since the fix was pushed under 7049339 I will swap that around,
closing 6775390 as a dup. of 7049339.
Thank you,
Denis.
----- Original Message -----
-phil.
On 6/24/2011 1:52 PM, Denis Lila wrote:
Hi Denis,
Looks good to me!
Thanks Jim!
----- Original Message -----
...jim
On 6/24/2011 10:19 AM, Denis Lila wrote:
Hi.
I think this webrev:
http://icedtea.classpath.org/~dlila/webrevs/Bug7049339/
fixes 7049339 and I would like to commit it.
At the very least it fixes batik-squiggle printing
and the included regression test.
Any comments are appreciated.
Thank you,
Denis.
